Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -20,17 +20,18 @@ tags:
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
# Dataset Card for PureForest
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-
##
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
-
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
| Class | Train (%) | Val (%) | Test (%) |
|
| 36 |
|-------|------------:|----------:|-----------:|
|
|
@@ -48,16 +49,30 @@ tags:
|
|
| 48 |
**(11) Larch**|3.67%|3.73%|0.48%
|
| 49 |
**(12) Douglas**|0.23%|1.95%|0.20%
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-
## Dataset
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
The PureForest dataset consists of a total of 135,569 patches: 69111 in the train set, 13523 in the validation set, and 52935 in the test set.
|
| 54 |
Each patch includes a high-resolution aerial image (250x250) at 0.2 m resolution, and a point cloud of high density aerial Lidar (10 pulses/m², ~40pts/m²).
|
| 55 |
-
Band order is Near Infrared, Red, Green, Blue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
Lidar points clouds | Aerial imagery
|
| 58 |
:-------------------------:|:-------------------------:
|
| 59 |
 | 
|
| 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
## Citation
|
| 63 |
Please include a citation to the following article if you use the PureForest dataset:
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
# Dataset Card for PureForest
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
## Context and Data
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
The hereby PureForest dataset is derived from 449 different forests located in 40 French departments, mainly in the southern regions.
|
| 26 |
+
It is characterized by two modalities: high density aerial Lidar point clouds with a density of 10 pulses per square meter,
|
| 27 |
+
and high resolution aerial imagery with a spatial resolution of 0.2 m.
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
This dataset includes 135,569 patches, each measuring 50m*50m, covering a cumulative exploitable area of 339km².
|
| 30 |
+
Each patch represents a monospecific forest, labeled with a single tree species to facilitate classification tasks.
|
| 31 |
+
The proposed classification features 13 semantic classes, hierarchically grouping 18 tree species from 9 different tree genus.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
A reference train/val/test split is provided with class stratification.
|
| 34 |
+
To account for spatial autocorrelation, each forest exclusively belongs to either the train, validation, or test set.
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
| Class | Train (%) | Val (%) | Test (%) |
|
| 37 |
|-------|------------:|----------:|-----------:|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
**(11) Larch**|3.67%|3.73%|0.48%
|
| 50 |
**(12) Douglas**|0.23%|1.95%|0.20%
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
The PureForest dataset consists of a total of 135,569 patches: 69111 in the train set, 13523 in the validation set, and 52935 in the test set.
|
| 55 |
Each patch includes a high-resolution aerial image (250x250) at 0.2 m resolution, and a point cloud of high density aerial Lidar (10 pulses/m², ~40pts/m²).
|
| 56 |
+
Band order is Near Infrared, Red, Green, Blue. For convenience, the Lidar point clouds are vertically colorized with the aerial images.
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
Lidar and imagery data were acquired over several years in distinct programs, and consequently they are asynchrone: depending on the location, up to 3 years might separate them.
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
Lidar points clouds | Aerial imagery
|
| 61 |
:-------------------------:|:-------------------------:
|
| 62 |
 | 
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
+
## Annotation
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
Annotation were made at the forest level, and considering only monospecific forests. A semi-automatic approach was adopted in which pure forest polygons
|
| 67 |
+
were selected and then curated by photointerpreters. The annotation polygons came from the [BD Forêt](https://inventaire-forestier.ign.fr/spip.php?article646),
|
| 68 |
+
a forest vector database of tree species occupation in France. Ground truths from the F[rench National Forest Inventory](https://inventaire-forestier.ign.fr/?lang=en)
|
| 69 |
+
were also used.
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
## Data Splits
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
The polygons were sampled in southern France due to the partial availability of the Lidar data at the time of dataset creation.
|
| 74 |
+
They are located in 40 distinct French administrative departments.
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
## Citation
|
| 78 |
Please include a citation to the following article if you use the PureForest dataset:
|