Home Subscribe Services Support Us
Print Version

Email this article to a friend

Parshas Ki Sisa
When Dignity Really Counts
By Rabbi Pinchas Winston

Friday Night:

G-d told Moshe, "When you take a count of the Israelites to determine their number, each one should be counted by giving an atonement offering for his life. In this way, they will not be stricken by the plague when they are counted ... " (Shemos 30:11)




Blessing is only found on that which is hidden from the eye ... And not on that which is weighed, measured, and counted ... (Ta'anis 8b)

We already discussed the concept of ayin hara from one vantage point in Parashas VeYechi (5758). However, the addition of the concept of "blessing" alludes to another dimension of this discussion, and alludes to some very deep and central concepts.

For example, the concept of a blessing is the idea of increasement (which is why the word "brocha" begins with the letter bais, which represents the number "two"). Sometimes G-d wishes to increase our lot in life miraculously, without our being directly involved (as in the case when someone earns a "bonus" at work). However, He also looks to work "undercover," only performing revealed miracles on special occasions. Therefore, if someone checks his bank account and watches it to the penny, then how can G-d increase the amount without it being known to the individual that a miracle has occurred? According to this idea, counting the money closes it off from such miraculous increasement.

Another way of looking at this idea is in a broader, more universal sense. Many people seem to have this innate desire to unify mankind, one way or another. People talk about "universal brotherhood" and similar ideas. Though their methods for achieving this ultimate state of humankind may be "off the wall," the notion itself is rooted deep within the esoteric teachings of Torah.

Kabballah talks about how everything can be traced back to a single source, G-d Himself. As the light of G-d "leaves" and "moves away" from G-d, it becomes more physical. The more physical the light becomes, the more "complex" it becomes, until, eventually, it results in so many different kinds and species, the number of which is beyond comprehension.

Eventually, the Kabballists explain, as history moves toward the 6,000th year (and beyond), creation will naturally re-unify with G-d once again to such a degree that many of the differences that interfere with such sublime unity will completely disappear. This is what the Talmud means which it says that "the only difference between this side of history and that of Moshiach's is that in the latter, no nation will oppress another" (Brochos 34b).



Weighing, measuring, and counting all are aspects of this physicality. The expression "Stand up and be counted" might as well say, "Stand out and be counted," since counting something makes something separate from everything else around it, a fragment of the whole. It is excessive individuality that interferes with the accomplishment of unity with others; the same thing is true of that which is measured and weighed.


Shabbos Day:

G-d said to Moshe, "Carve out two tablets for yourself, just like the first ones ... " (Shemos 34:1)

Well, not exactly. The first set of Ten Commandments that Moshe had descended with at the time of the golden calf had not only been inscribed by G-d, but the Tablets themselves had been carved out by G-d as well. Though the "replacement" tablets were also going to be inscribed by G-d, the actual carving out of the tablets, it seemed, was to be Moshe's doing.





This difference was also alluded to by the fact that the First Tablets contained 17 less words than the Second Tablets (Ba'al HaTurim, Parashas Aikev). This can be understood to mean that, as a result of the golden calf and the ensuing "physicalization" of the Jewish nation, it took more words to express the same lofty concepts found on the First Tablets. As a result, says the Pri Tzaddik (Parashas Aikev, 2), we are forced to exert more energy to draw out the levels of meaning meant to be available to us through Torah.



The Tablets were the work of G-d and the writing was that of G-d engraved (charus) on the Tablets. Don't read charus (engraved), but cheirus (freedom), for there is no one freer than one who studies the Torah. (Pirke Avos, 6:2)


The answer is, the Second Tablets were not the replacement for the First Tablets, but a medium through which to access them. Just as seeing glasses act as a corrective device for one whose vision has become impaired, so too did the Second Tablets act as a "corrective device" to help us recover what was lost when Moshe broke the First Tablets.


Seudos Shishi:

G-d said to Moshe, "I have chosen Betzalel son of Uri son of Chur of the tribe of Yehudah, by name. I have filled him with Divine spirit, with wisdom, understanding and knowledge ... " (Shemos 31:1)

It is one thing to be an architect; it is something altogether different to be G-d's architect in the building of the Mishkan, a miniature version of the G-d's own creation, the world itself. What made Betzalel so special? The Talmud explains:

Betzalel was named as an indication of his wisdom. When The Holy One, Blessed is He, told Moshe, "Tell Betzalel to make Me a Mishkan, an Aron, and implements," Moshe switched the order and said, "an Aron, implements, and a Mishkan." He [Betzalel] asked him, "Moshe Rabbeinu, is it not the way of the world to first build a house and then after put the vessels into it? And yet, you are telling me to first make the Aron and the implements! Where shall I put them?" He answered him, "[You're right!] That's how The Holy One, Blessed be He, told me to do it ... Make a Mishkan, an Aron, and then the implements. Perhaps you were in the shadow of G-d (b'ztel E"l)?" (Brochos 55a)

But, as if that genius wasn't enough, the Talmud adds:

... Betzalel knew how to combine the letters [of the Aleph-Bais] that were used to make heaven and earth.

However, as the Talmud concludes, that was wisdom that came from G-d. Nevertheless, it was Betzalel's initial wisdom that prompted the gift of Divine understanding, for, as the Talmud concludes, G-d gives wisdom to the wise.

Perhaps the original verse itself indicates another aspect of Betzalel's greatness and reason for being chosen from amongst millions of people, when it mentions the name of Betzalel's grandfather and tribe (his father's name can be considered an identifying family name).

Who was Chur?

There is a disagreement in the midrash as to whether Chur was Miriam's (Moshe's sister) husband or son. Regardless, Chur had illustrious ancestry: Yehudah, Peretz, Chetzron and Kaleiv. His was the line through which the kingship of Israel passed on the way to King David, and eventually Moshiach.


However, Chur's own trait was not unique to him, but to his entire tribe. When Yehudah was faced with the choice of "facing the music" and taking responsibility for unknowingly impregnating his daughter-in-law, Tamar, or letting her die accused of improper behavior, Yehudah "took the wrap" (as they say). For this reason, Yehudah's own father, Ya'akov Avinu, on his deathbed not only praised Yehudah, but he cited that event as the basis for the consensus of his right to the Jewish throne.

Why should this trait play such a central role in building the kingdom of the Jewish people? Because being "modeh" (admitting) to truth without concern for personal humiliation reveals a commitment to a higher level of truth, G-d's truth. This is a trait that most kings of the past barely even grappled with, yet, it is the root of the Jewish Malchus. It was also Chur's and Betzalel's spiritual inheritance ... the foundation upon which the Mishkan would eventually stand.

Melave Malkah:

The commentators "go to town" on the name Amalek, the ancestor of Haman, each one looking for another clue to the essence of Amalek's inherent evil. One such "drush" is "amull-kuf" (ayin, mem, lamed-kuf), made up of Amalek's letters of his name, which means "work of a monkey."

There are many ways to understand this, but one very relevant way is to understand that Amalek comes to reduce human dignity. Man was made in the "image of G-d," which was to be our sense of loftiness, and to separate us from the animal world that, physically, can come very close to what we look like and do. The question many still pose: Is man imbued with a holy soul, or only some hitherto unexplained form of consciousness and self-awareness ... Is he a monkey, or something altogether different (no matter how well-trained a chimpanzee can be)?

On the surface, such questions seem self-honest. After all, what fulfillment-seeking human being doesn't want to better understand his origin, be it physical, spiritual, or both? Science demands that we ask questions-all the questions-even if they reflect negatively on the stature of man.

No, says the Torah, that is not so. The Torah states outright that man did not descend from apes, but was formed from the dust of the ground (as were the animals), and then imbued with a holy, godly soul (unlike the animals). If you want to ask a scientific question, such as, "How do we know Torah is true, and that G-d gave it at Sinai?" and then research the answer, that is an important step along the way to finding G-d, a key to developing a keen sense of human dignity.

However, to dismiss the Torah out-of-hand and ask questions like, "Why does the monkey look so familiar to us, and act so human? Can it be ... ?"

Questions such as those are the work of Amalek, of the "monkey" himself. Why? Because, ultimately, the goal of Amaleks, and of Hamans, and of Hitlers, is to sever man's connection to G-d. The Amalekian approach is one that attacks the relationship of man to G-d by reducing man's own sense of godliness. Does it really make a difference, in the long run, whether you call man descended from monkeys, or whether you make him build golden calves, or more recently, stand, completely disgraced and immodest in front of one another and cruel murderers (one can't help but wonder if allowing the public to view pictures of such scenes doesn't, in fact, perpetuate this deep sense of shame and humiliation)?

(After all, Hitler, may his name and memory be erased, was a self-professed Social-Darwinist, who believed whole-heartedly in the philosophy of "survival of the fittest." One of his chief complaints against the Jewish people was that they corrupted the natural course of mankind, by teaching that the strong must help the weak survive.)


Purim celebrates the reversal of this trend. It comes to "lift the heads" of mankind (to borrow the language of the first verse of this week's parsha), to defeat the Hamans of history by restoring our sense of Elokus (godliness). This is why, according to the Rambam, there is an special mitzvah of helping out the poor on Purim, and why one who does is compared to G-d Himself. For, when one helps out a downhearted person, they restore his hope, just as G-d did to the Jews of Persia in Haman's time.



A Freilechen Purim,
Shabbat Shalom.

Pinchas Winston




View Complete List

Certainty From Uncertainty
Rabbi Dovid Green - 5762

The Oldest Lesson in History
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

Past Perfect
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5763


Where are You?
Rabbi Pinchas Avruch - 5762

Huts or Houses
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5759

Rabbi Pinchas Winston - 5770

> Not Competition, Composition!
Rabbi Label Lam - 5763

Somebody's a Nobody
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5759

The Nature of Human Behavior
Rabbi Berel Wein - 5773

Looking for a Chavrusah?

The Four Species
Rabbi Yehudah Prero - 5755

Goal Tending
Rabbi Mordechai Kamenetzky - 5761

Rabbi Yissocher Frand - 5767

Frumster - Orthodox Jewish Dating

The Auction of The Year!
Rabbi Aron Tendler - 5760

Great Expectations
Rabbi Yochanan Zweig - 5770

- 5768

Picking Up the Pieces
Rabbi Eliyahu Hoffmann - 5761

Project Genesis Home

Torah Portion

Jewish Law



Learn the Basics




Ask The Rabbi

Knowledge Base


About Us

Contact Us

Free Book on Geulah! Home Copyright Information