<p>What is the % code-coverage on your project?  I'm curious as to reasons why.</p>

<p>Is the dev team happy with it? If not, what stands in the way from increasing it? </p>

<p>Stuart Halloway is one whose projects aim for 100% (or else the build breaks!). Is anyone at that level?</p>

<p>We are at a painful 25% but aspire to 80-90% for new code.  We have legacy code that we have decided to leave alone as it evaporates (we are actively re-writing).</p>

We run at 85% code coverage, but falling below it does not break the build.  I think using code coverage as an important metric is a dangerous practice.  Just because something is covered in a test does not mean the coverage is any good.  We try to use it as guidance for the areas we are weakly covered, not as a hard fact.