<p>We deployed a live, fresh, swanky site using preview 3 including rigorous stress testing. </p>

<p>Page Output caching was our saviour and afforded us the ability to meet our performance contractual requirements.</p>

<p>My question is, is there a difference between action <code>OutputCacheFilter</code> and page output caching?</p>

<p>Is the action output caching faster than page output caching?</p>

Internally, the OutputCacheAttribute (aka output cache filter) uses the same internal mechanism as
page output caching
(aka the @OutputCache directive).
Therefore, it's not any faster than page output caching. However, with MVC, you really can't use page output caching via the @OutputCache directive in MVC because we render the view (aka page)
after
the action runs. So you would gain very little benefit.
With the output cache filter, it does the correct thing and does not execute the action code if the result is in the output cache. Hope that helps. :)