Groundbreaking Research Alert: Correctness ≠ Faithfulness in RAG Systems
text
Groundbreaking Research Alert: Correctness ≠ Faithfulness in RAG Systems
new_line
new_line
Fascinating new research from L3S Research Center, University of Amsterdam, and TU Delft reveals a critical insight into Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. The study exposes that up to 57% of citations in RAG systems could be unfaithful, despite being technically correct.
text
Fascinating new research from L3S Research Center, University of Amsterdam, and TU Delft reveals a critical insight into Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. The study exposes that up to 57% of citations in RAG systems could be unfaithful, despite being technically correct.
new_line
new_line
>> Key Technical Insights:
text
>> Key Technical Insights:
new_line
new_line
Post-rationalization Problem
text
Post-rationalization Problem
new_line
The researchers discovered that RAG systems often engage in "post-rationalization" - where models first generate answers from their parametric memory and then search for supporting evidence afterward. This means that while citations may be correct, they don't reflect the actual reasoning process.
text
The researchers discovered that RAG systems often engage in "post-rationalization" - where models first generate answers from their parametric memory and then search for supporting evidence afterward. This means that while citations may be correct, they don't reflect the actual reasoning process.
new_line
new_line
Experimental Design
text
Experimental Design
new_line
The team used Command-R+ (104B parameters) with 4-bit quantization on NVIDIA A100 GPU, testing on the NaturalQuestions dataset. They employed BM25 for initial retrieval and ColBERT v2 for reranking.
text
The team used Command-R+ (104B parameters) with 4-bit quantization on NVIDIA A100 GPU, testing on the NaturalQuestions dataset. They employed BM25 for initial retrieval and ColBERT v2 for reranking.
new_line
new_line
Attribution Framework
text
Attribution Framework
new_line
The research introduces a comprehensive framework for evaluating RAG systems across multiple dimensions:
text
The research introduces a comprehensive framework for evaluating RAG systems across multiple dimensions:
new_line
- Citation Correctness: Whether cited documents support the claims
text
- Citation Correctness: Whether cited documents support the claims
new_line
- Citation Faithfulness: Whether citations reflect actual model reasoning
text
- Citation Faithfulness: Whether citations reflect actual model reasoning
new_line
- Citation Appropriateness: Relevance and meaningfulness of citations
text
- Citation Appropriateness: Relevance and meaningfulness of citations
new_line
- Citation Comprehensiveness: Coverage of key points
text
- Citation Comprehensiveness: Coverage of key points
new_line
new_line
Under the Hood
text
Under the Hood
new_line
The system processes involve:
text
The system processes involve:
new_line
1. Document relevance prediction
text
1. Document relevance prediction
new_line
2. Citation prediction
text
2. Citation prediction
new_line
3. Answer generation without citations
text
3. Answer generation without citations
new_line
4. Answer generation with citations
text
4. Answer generation with citations
new_line
new_line
This work fundamentally challenges our understanding of RAG systems and highlights the need for more robust evaluation metrics in AI systems that claim to provide verifiable information.
text
This work fundamentally challenges our understanding of RAG systems and highlights the need for more robust evaluation metrics in AI systems that claim to provide verifiable information.
new_line
Groundbreaking Research Alert: Correctness ≠ Faithfulness in RAG Systems

Fascinating new research from L3S Research Center, University of Amsterdam, and TU Delft reveals a critical insight into Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. The study exposes that up to 57% of citations in RAG systems could be unfaithful, despite being technically correct.

>> Key Technical Insights:

Post-rationalization Problem
The researchers discovered that RAG systems often engage in "post-rationalization" - where models first generate answers from their parametric memory and then search for supporting evidence afterward. This means that while citations may be correct, they don't reflect the actual reasoning process.

Experimental Design
The team used Command-R+ (104B parameters) with 4-bit quantization on NVIDIA A100 GPU, testing on the NaturalQuestions dataset. They employed BM25 for initial retrieval and ColBERT v2 for reranking.

Attribution Framework
The research introduces a comprehensive framework for evaluating RAG systems across multiple dimensions:
- Citation Correctness: Whether cited documents support the claims
- Citation Faithfulness: Whether citations reflect actual model reasoning
- Citation Appropriateness: Relevance and meaningfulness of citations
- Citation Comprehensiveness: Coverage of key points

Under the Hood
The system processes involve:
1. Document relevance prediction
2. Citation prediction
3. Answer generation without citations
4. Answer generation with citations

This work fundamentally challenges our understanding of RAG systems and highlights the need for more robust evaluation metrics in AI systems that claim to provide verifiable information.

👀
csabakecskemeti John6666 Daemontatox
64e6d37e02dee9bcb9d9fa18
https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/64e6d37e02dee9bcb9d9fa18/os24VYiNCoyth9yQSdv_A.jpeg
Csaba  Kecskemeti
csabakecskemeti
user