✅ New Article: Designing Semantic Memory (v0.1)
text
✅ New Article: Designing Semantic Memory (v0.1)
new_line
new_line
Title:
text
Title:
new_line
🧠 Designing Semantic Memory: SIM/SIS Patterns for Real Systems
text
🧠 Designing Semantic Memory: SIM/SIS Patterns for Real Systems
new_line
🔗 
text
🔗 
https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/designing-semantic-memory
https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/designing-semantic-memory
link
new_line
new_line
---
text
---
new_line
new_line
Summary:
text
Summary:
new_line
Semantic Compression is about *what meaning to keep*.
text
Semantic Compression is about *what meaning to keep*.
new_line
This article is about *where that meaning lives*—and how to keep it *queryable, explainable, and governable* using two layers:
text
This article is about *where that meaning lives*—and how to keep it *queryable, explainable, and governable* using two layers:
new_line
new_line
* *SIM*: operational semantic memory (low-latency, recent, jump-loop-adjacent)
text
* *SIM*: operational semantic memory (low-latency, recent, jump-loop-adjacent)
new_line
* *SIS*: archival/analytic semantic store (long retention, heavy queries, audits)
text
* *SIS*: archival/analytic semantic store (long retention, heavy queries, audits)
new_line
new_line
Core idea: store “meaning” as *typed semantic units* with scope, provenance, goal tags, retention, and *backing_refs* (URI/hash/ledger anchors) so you can answer *“why did we do X?”* without turning memory into a blob.
text
Core idea: store “meaning” as *typed semantic units* with scope, provenance, goal tags, retention, and *backing_refs* (URI/hash/ledger anchors) so you can answer *“why did we do X?”* without turning memory into a blob.
new_line
new_line
---
text
---
new_line
new_line
Why It Matters:
text
Why It Matters:
new_line
• Prevents “semantic junk drawer” memory: *units become contracts*, not vibes
text
• Prevents “semantic junk drawer” memory: *units become contracts*, not vibes
new_line
• Makes audits and incidents tractable: *reconstruct semantic context* (L3-grade)
text
• Makes audits and incidents tractable: *reconstruct semantic context* (L3-grade)
new_line
• Preserves reversibility/accountability with *backing_refs*, even under redaction
text
• Preserves reversibility/accountability with *backing_refs*, even under redaction
new_line
• Adds semantic health checks: *SCover_sem / SInt / LAR_sem* (memory that stays reliable)
text
• Adds semantic health checks: *SCover_sem / SInt / LAR_sem* (memory that stays reliable)
new_line
new_line
---
text
---
new_line
new_line
What’s Inside:
text
What’s Inside:
new_line
• Minimal *semantic_unit* schema you can run on relational/doc/graph backends
text
• Minimal *semantic_unit* schema you can run on relational/doc/graph backends
new_line
• Query/index playbook: ops (L1/L2) vs evidence/audit (L3)
text
• Query/index playbook: ops (L1/L2) vs evidence/audit (L3)
new_line
• Domain patterns (CityOS / OSS supply chain / learning-support)
text
• Domain patterns (CityOS / OSS supply chain / learning-support)
new_line
• Migration path: sidecar writer → low-risk reads → SI-Core integration
text
• Migration path: sidecar writer → low-risk reads → SI-Core integration
new_line
• Failure modes & anti-patterns: missing backing_refs, over-eager redaction, SIM-as-cache, etc.
text
• Failure modes & anti-patterns: missing backing_refs, over-eager redaction, SIM-as-cache, etc.
new_line
new_line
---
text
---
new_line
new_line
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
text
📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
new_line
Formal contracts live in the spec/eval packs; this is the *how-to-model / how-to-operate* layer for semantic memory that can survive real audits and real failures.
text
Formal contracts live in the spec/eval packs; this is the *how-to-model / how-to-operate* layer for semantic memory that can survive real audits and real failures.
new_line
✅ New Article: Designing Semantic Memory (v0.1)

Title:
🧠 Designing Semantic Memory: SIM/SIS Patterns for Real Systems
🔗 https://huggingface.co/blog/kanaria007/designing-semantic-memory

---

Summary:
Semantic Compression is about *what meaning to keep*.
This article is about *where that meaning lives*—and how to keep it *queryable, explainable, and governable* using two layers:

* *SIM*: operational semantic memory (low-latency, recent, jump-loop-adjacent)
* *SIS*: archival/analytic semantic store (long retention, heavy queries, audits)

Core idea: store “meaning” as *typed semantic units* with scope, provenance, goal tags, retention, and *backing_refs* (URI/hash/ledger anchors) so you can answer *“why did we do X?”* without turning memory into a blob.

---

Why It Matters:
• Prevents “semantic junk drawer” memory: *units become contracts*, not vibes
• Makes audits and incidents tractable: *reconstruct semantic context* (L3-grade)
• Preserves reversibility/accountability with *backing_refs*, even under redaction
• Adds semantic health checks: *SCover_sem / SInt / LAR_sem* (memory that stays reliable)

---

What’s Inside:
• Minimal *semantic_unit* schema you can run on relational/doc/graph backends
• Query/index playbook: ops (L1/L2) vs evidence/audit (L3)
• Domain patterns (CityOS / OSS supply chain / learning-support)
• Migration path: sidecar writer → low-risk reads → SI-Core integration
• Failure modes & anti-patterns: missing backing_refs, over-eager redaction, SIM-as-cache, etc.

---

📖 Structured Intelligence Engineering Series
Formal contracts live in the spec/eval packs; this is the *how-to-model / how-to-operate* layer for semantic memory that can survive real audits and real failures.

❤️
Ujjwal-Tyagi Annapurna07 John6666
68dff9449ab7f4d313d5d74e
https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/68dff9449ab7f4d313d5d74e/_TS11DlSrSH29w1c4pkFh.jpeg
Ujjwal Tyagi
Ujjwal-Tyagi
user
683d8074b4eeed0569993bcc
https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/noauth/mrB2AFA3K9g3gJz-WxxjH.jpeg
kanaria007
kanaria007
user