Why is 'just being expensive' considered a 'feature'?
Business trip, 3 days. Stupid expensive. Wanted a diet sprite, $10.90 from room service. And no, you cannot get one at the shop downstairs.
Staid and boring appointments. Very high quality in the ritz style. Thick, heavy granite and marble- spacious. But clearly aging. Worns spots on furnishings in the room and in the common area and bar. 
Good service- attentive and personal. Fast.
We had a meeting room: $50 per login to the wireless connection. Per device. So 5 of us, $250 extra for internet on top of the $1200 for the meeting room and the $600 food charges.
Worst Part? NO HD TELEVISION PROGRAMMING. Monday night football, baseballl play off, first worlds series.
The advertise "HD Television", but the programs are SD. The tv is hd, but there is no HD programming. I mean what hotel in america that charges $450 a night DOESN'T offer HD?!??!? As I asked the manager, "Do you change the sheets every night?" He said "yes we do" And I said "Precisely, one should not have to ask "do you have HD ***PROGRAMMING***" at a hotel that charges what you charge"
Management is uniquely unapologetic to any of this- "yes, it is terrible- it is definitely on the list for 2013". I was particularly pissed off when I looked at their website and they advertised "HD Television" as a room ammenity. 
Be Warned: If TV is a consideration, ASK all sheraton & Ritz properties if they've upgraded...apparently this is a broader issue with corporate and lodgenet.