V16
首先非常感谢作者的更新，大佬辛苦了！
我看了评论区都说V16好用，可是我用起来感觉很糟糕。
我用的是NSFW版本，单图编辑出来的图片色差对比度太高了。就像是过了一层美颜滤镜。试了好多遍都是这样，而且V16对男性隐私部位的生成非常差。
My experience is also not too good, faces is bad and eyes are broken. but maybe its a stage version. Great work.
是不是工作流有问题，采样器，或者被其它lora影响了。
Can you share a screenshot of a workflow and example of this happening?
一样问题，14.1之前是正常的，同样工作流，而且找不到作者提到的采样，er_ede。先感谢作者。
Can you share a screenshot of a workflow and example of this happening?
Sure. This is very strange. With versions 14.X and earlier, the same workflow worked very well, but with this version... I'm not sure if there's anything specific I need to be aware of.
Following are the screenshot and the preview out with workflow.
Can you share a screenshot of a workflow and example of this happening?
Sure. This is very strange. With versions 14.X and earlier, the same workflow worked very well, but with this version... I'm not sure if there's anything specific I need to be aware of.
Following are the screenshot and the preview out with workflow.
Maybe the problem is step is 6 . When I set to 4 it's better.
I don't think there is an 8-step LORA available yet, so I mix in the 2509 8-step to try and improve >4 step workflows. As more stuff comes out, I'll be able to improve. Prompting more soft lighting or overcast skies might help the contrast.
EDIT: Also, saying something like "natural photograph" can really help too, as you don't provide any style or lighting guidance.
首先非常感谢作者的更新，大佬辛苦了！
我看了评论区都说V16好用，可是我用起来感觉很糟糕。
我用的是NSFW版本，单图编辑出来的图片色差对比度太高了。就像是过了一层美颜滤镜。试了好多遍都是这样，而且V16对男性隐私部位的生成非常差。
这不是AIO的问题，是2511本身或者刚出的这个4步加速lora的问题，直接用原版2511+4步加速，出来的图就会像是色相加深，亮度提高一样，有时还会有一些像柔光滤镜一样的辉光。
I don't know how you are doing it guys, but for me the v16 is a total mess.
I don't know how you are doing it guys, but for me the v16 is a total mess.
After quite a bit of testing, I don't think it is that good, but not a "total mess". With that said, I'm uploading a v17 now which is a significant changeup by merging both 2509 and 2511 together.
Thats so weird, I've had zero problems with v16. I went from 11.1 to 16, but I'll download 17 now to see if there's a bump, but honestly if it ain't broke.......
I think I was noticing some contrast issues and definitely some LORA compatibility problems with raw 2511... mixing in ~35% of 2509 (with a bunch of good 2509 LORAs applied within that 35%) seems to be working out pretty good with v17 imho. However, use whatever version works best for you! I totally get the "if it ain't broke" mentality.
Thank you so much for the great work, V16 is really, really good. For me, it's the best version so far. I haven't tested V17/18 yet. Thanks for your efforts.
Greetings!