question
stringlengths 465
644
| answer
stringlengths 3.94k
5.04k
|
|---|---|
Identify the best robot vacuums specifically designed for homes with pets, focusing on suction power for pet hair, tangle-free brush roll technology, filtration systems for allergens, and navigation capabilities for complex home layouts. List qualifying models, detail their specifications (battery life, dustbin capacity, noise level), smart features (app control, scheduling, no-go zones), pricing, and warranty. Compare them and recommend the top robot vacuum for a pet owner seeking maximum cleaning efficiency and convenience.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTRODUCTION ➜ Inside one <p> (≈80 words), describe the search strategy: keywords like “best robot vacuum pet hair”, “robot vacuum anti-tangle brush”, “HEPA filter robot cleaner”; sources: consumer tech review sites, pet owner forums, product testing labs (e.g., Consumer Reports if data available), official brand websites; focus on models updated or highly rated in the last 12-18 months. Explain why pet-specific features are crucial. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four prominent robot vacuum brands known for pet features, each <li> containing the brand name and one citation tag.",
"2": "PET HAIR & ALLERGEN FEATURE CHECKLIST ➜ Produce an HTML unordered list (<ul>) where each <li> indicates ✅ if the model has specialized pet hair suction/brush AND a high-efficiency filter (e.g., HEPA), or ❌ if lacking one or both. Follow with the brand and model name. Note if specific anti-tangle technology is advertised. Maximum ten <li> elements; include one citation per item.",
"3": "NAVIGATION & SMART FEATURES TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (with <thead> and <tbody>) with three columns: Model | Navigation Technology (e.g., LiDAR, vSLAM, Gyro) & Mapping | Key Smart Features (e.g., App control, No-go zones, Room selection). Summarize tech and list 2-3 smart features. Limit to six top models. Each row must have a citation tag. Center-align the 'Navigation Technology & Mapping' column.",
"4": "CORE PERFORMANCE SPECS TABLE ➜ Build an HTML table listing the five strongest contenders with columns: Model, Suction Power (Pa, if available), Battery Life (minutes), Dustbin Capacity (ml), Noise Level (dB). Numeric cells should be right-aligned using <td style=\"text-align:right;\">. After the </table>, add a 30-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> if suction power figures are vendor-claimed and vary in methodology. Cite every numeric cell.",
"5": "PRICING & WARRANTY TABLE ➜ Create another HTML table for the same five models. Each model gets one row with columns: Model, Typical Price ($), Warranty Period (Overall, e.g., 1 year), Battery Warranty (if different). Show prices using $. Close the table, then add one <p> (≤25 words) about potential variations in price based on retailer or sales. Cite every price and warranty detail.",
"6": "NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS ON CLEANING EFFECTIVENESS ➜ Write ≈125 words inside a single <p> weaving together the pet hair pickup ability, navigation intelligence, ease of maintenance (emptying bin, cleaning brush), and app usability for *each* of the top 3-4 models. Bold the model name on first mention with <strong>…</strong>. Insert at least two inline citations, for instance, referencing a review that tests pet hair removal.",
"7": "PET HAIR PICKUP SCORE VS. PRICE SCATTERPLOT ➜ Before the chart, output a 40-word <p> describing it: 'Pet Hair Cleaning Performance Score (Y-axis, 1-10 scale from aggregated reviews) against Current Market Price (X-axis)'. Then embed the image with <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Robot vacuum pet hair score vs price scatterplot\"> followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Robot Vacuums: Pet Hair Performance vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Finish with one sentence interpreting which models offer the best cleaning value for pet owners.",
"8": "RANKING LIST FOR PET OWNERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 models. Each <li> contains the model name, an em-dash (—) and a 16-word rationale focusing on its effectiveness on pet hair, navigation skill, and overall convenience for homes with pets. No citations here.",
"9": "STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES (PET FOCUS) ➜ Output an unordered list (<ul>). For every ranked model, make one <li> that contains 🐾 <strong>Pro for Pets:</strong> … and ⚠️ <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (≤28 words total, focusing on pet-related aspects). No new data or citations.",
"10": "FINAL PICK & MAINTENANCE TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Top Robot Vacuum for Pet Homes</h2>, then a 75-word recommendation paragraph in a <p>. Include the official product page URL as plain text. Follow with an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of three quick tips for optimal use with pets (e.g., regular brush/filter cleaning, securing pet water bowls, running daily schedules). End with one citation that supports the product URL."
}
|
Identify the top e-commerce platforms suitable for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) looking to establish an online store. Prioritize ease of use for non-developers, range of built-in sales and marketing tools, scalability, payment gateway integrations, and transparent pricing (including transaction fees). List relevant platforms, detail their key features for SMBs, pricing tiers, customer support options, and any significant limitations. Compare them and recommend the best all-around platform for an SMB aiming for growth.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & PLATFORM INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> of ≈80 words, detail the search: keywords “best ecommerce platform SMB”, “easy online store builder”, “small business ecommerce solutions”; sources: business software review sites (e.g., G2, Capterra), e-commerce expert blogs, official platform comparisons, user forums; timeframe: features and pricing within the last year. Explain the core needs of an SMB online store. Conclude with an HTML <ul> of exactly four widely-used e-commerce platforms, each <li> with the platform name and a citation.",
"2": "EASE OF USE & CORE COMMERCE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the platform offers a drag-and-drop builder AND built-in inventory management, or ❌ if it heavily relies on coding or third-party apps for basic functions. Follow with the platform name. Note if a free trial or free plan is available. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "SALES CHANNELS & MARKETING TOOLS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Platform | Supported Sales Channels (e.g., Social media, Marketplaces) | Built-in Marketing Tools (e.g., Email marketing, SEO, Discounts). Summarize key channels and list 2-3 notable marketing tools. Limit to six platforms. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "PAYMENT & SHIPPING INTEGRATION SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five platforms. Columns: Platform, Integrated Payment Gateways (e.g., Stripe, PayPal, Own), Transaction Fees (if using own gateway), Shipping Options (e.g., Carrier integrations, Real-time rates), App Store/Ecosystem Quality. For 'Transaction Fees', specify percentage or if none. After </table>, add a 30-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> noting that third-party gateway fees are separate. Cite each detail.",
"5": "PRICING TIERS FOR SMBs & SUPPORT TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five platforms. Rows per platform: Entry-Level Paid Plan (Name, Price $/month), Mid-Tier Plan (Name, Price $/month), Key Support Channels (e.g., 24/7 chat, phone, knowledge base). Display prices with $. Close the table with a <p> (≤25 words) about annual discounts or higher-tier benefits. Cite all pricing and support info.",
"6": "NARRATIVE PLATFORM SUITABILITY & SCALABILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the platform's suitability for different types of SMBs (e.g., product-based, service-based), the ease of managing a growing product catalog and order volume, and the overall intuitiveness of the admin panel for *each* of the top 3-4 platforms. Bold the platform name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews or case studies.",
"7": "FEATURE RICHNESS VS. MONTHLY COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Composite SMB Feature Score (Y-axis, based on sales tools, marketing, integrations) against Monthly Cost for a comparable mid-tier plan (X-axis)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"E-commerce platform feature score vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – E-commerce Platforms: SMB Features vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which platforms offer a strong feature set for the price.",
"8": "RANKING OF E-COMMERCE PLATFORMS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 platforms. Each <li> must contain the platform name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting ease of use, sales features, scalability for SMBs, and overall value. No citations here.",
"9": "PLATFORM ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked platform, create one <li> with 🚀 <strong>Key Strength:</strong> … and 📉 <strong>Potential Drawback:</strong> … (total ≤30 words). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & LAUNCH TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best E-commerce Platform for SMB Growth</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning platform and why its blend of usability, features, and scalable pricing makes it optimal for ambitious SMBs. Include the plain text sign-up/homepage URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick launch tips (e.g., optimize product photography, set up key payment/shipping options, create a basic marketing plan). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Analyze the leading fitness trackers with a strong emphasis on sleep monitoring capabilities, including detailed sleep stage analysis (light, deep, REM), sleep scoring, and actionable insights for improvement. Also consider heart rate accuracy, battery life (minimum 5 days), and app user experience. List qualifying trackers, their specific sleep tracking technologies, other health metrics monitored, pricing, and device compatibility. Compare them and recommend the best fitness tracker for a user prioritizing comprehensive sleep analysis.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH FOCUS & TRACKER INTRODUCTION ➜ Inside a <p> of ≈75 words, outline the search: keywords “best fitness tracker sleep analysis”, “accurate sleep stage tracker”, “wearable REM sleep monitor”; sources: health and wearable tech review sites, sleep science blogs that test wearables, user forums, device clinical validation papers if available; timeframe: latest models from past 18 months. Emphasize the growing importance of sleep data. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four major brands in the fitness tracker market, each <li> with the brand name and a citation.",
"2": "ADVANCED SLEEP TRACKING CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the tracker provides detailed sleep stages (Light, Deep, REM) AND a sleep score, or ❌ if it offers only basic sleep duration. Follow with the brand/model name. Note if SpO2 monitoring during sleep is included. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "HEALTH SENSORS & BATTERY LIFE TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Tracker Model | Key Sleep Sensors Used (e.g., Accelerometer, PPG for HR, SpO2) | Claimed Battery Life (days during typical use with sleep tracking). Summarize sensors and provide battery life. Limit to six top trackers. Each row requires a citation tag. Numeric 'Battery Life' cells: <td style=\"text-align:right;\">.",
"4": "OTHER HEALTH METRICS & APP FEATURES ➜ Build an HTML table for the five strongest contenders. Columns: Model, Other Monitored Metrics (e.g., Steps, HRV, Stress, ECG), App Insights & Reports (e.g., Sleep coaching, Readiness score), Smart Features (e.g., Notifications, GPS). List 2-3 key metrics/features per cell. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> if some features require a premium subscription. Cite each capability.",
"5": "PRICING & COMPATIBILITY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five trackers. Rows per tracker: Model, MSRP ($), Subscription Cost for Premium Features ($/month, if any), Device Compatibility (iOS, Android). Show prices in $. Conclude with a <p> (≤25 words) noting that app experience can be a major differentiator. Cite all pricing and compatibility.",
"6": "NARRATIVE SLEEP DATA ACCURACY & ACTIONABILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the perceived accuracy of sleep stage detection (based on reviews/comparisons), the clarity and usefulness of the sleep insights provided by the companion app, and overall user experience for *each* of the top 3-4 trackers. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations, e.g., one for a claim about REM tracking accuracy, another for app usability.",
"7": "SLEEP SCORE ACCURACY VS. BATTERY LIFE PLOT ➜ Before the graph, provide a 40-word <p> explaining it: 'Aggregated Sleep Tracking Accuracy Score (Y-axis, 1-10 from reviews/studies) against Claimed Battery Life in Days (X-axis)'. Embed with <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Fitness tracker sleep accuracy vs battery life scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Fitness Trackers: Sleep Accuracy vs. Endurance [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence identifying trackers offering both high accuracy and good battery life.",
"8": "RANKING OF SLEEP-FOCUSED TRACKERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 trackers. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification focusing on sleep analysis depth, accuracy, actionable insights, and battery performance. No citations.",
"9": "TRACKER HIGHLIGHTS & LIMITATIONS (SLEEP) ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked tracker, create one <li> with 🌙 <strong>Sleep Tracking Pro:</strong> … and ⚠️ <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (total ≤27 words, emphasizing sleep aspects). Base on prior cited material.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & USAGE TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Tracker for Sleep Insights</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning tracker and explaining why its comprehensive sleep analysis features and supporting app make it ideal for users focused on understanding and improving sleep. Include the plain text official product URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three tips for accurate sleep tracking (e.g., wear snugly but comfortably, maintain consistent sleep schedule, sync data daily). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Evaluate the top online graphic design tools (like Canva alternatives) for users without professional design experience, focusing on ease of use (intuitive interface, templates), range of design assets (stock photos, elements, fonts), available output formats, and collaboration features. List qualifying tools, detail their free vs. paid plan features, pricing, template categories, and any unique AI-powered design assistance. Compare them and recommend the best tool for individuals or small teams needing to create social media graphics, presentations, and simple marketing materials quickly.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & TOOL INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), describe the search: keywords “best online graphic design tool for non-designers”, “Canva alternatives easy”, “free social media graphics creator”; sources: design blogs, marketing resource sites, software review platforms, user tutorials; focus on tools with a strong template library and gentle learning curve, updated in the last year. Briefly state the demand for such tools. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four popular online graphic design tools, each <li> with tool name and a citation.",
"2": "EASE OF USE & TEMPLATE AVAILABILITY CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul> where each <li> starts with ✅ if the tool offers an intuitive drag-and-drop interface AND a substantial library of free templates for common uses (social media, presentations), or ❌ if it's less intuitive or free templates are very limited. Follow with the tool name. Note if a mobile app is also offered. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "DESIGN ASSETS & OUTPUT FORMATS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Tool | Key Free Design Assets (Stock images, elements, fonts) | Supported Output Formats (e.g., JPG, PNG, PDF, MP4). Summarize asset availability and list common formats. Limit to six top tools. Each row needs a citation tag.",
"4": "ADVANCED FEATURES & COLLABORATION SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the five strongest contenders. Columns: Tool, AI Design Assistance (e.g., Magic resize, background remover), Brand Kit Feature, Real-time Collaboration, Version History. Indicate availability (Free/Paid tier). After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about how AI features often require paid plans. Cite each feature claim.",
"5": "PRICING (FREE VS. PAID) & USER LIMITS TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five tools. Rows per tool: Free Plan Limitations (e.g., Watermarks, limited assets), Individual Paid Plan ($/month), Team Plan ($/month per user, typical user count). Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤30 words) noting the value proposition of paid plans for frequent users or teams. Cite all pricing information.",
"6": "NARRATIVE USABILITY & CREATIVE OUTPUT QUALITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in a single <p> discussing the learning curve for new users, the quality and variety of templates and assets, and the overall speed of creating professional-looking graphics for *each* of the top 3-4 tools. Bold the tool name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews or design tutorials.",
"7": "TEMPLATE QUANTITY/QUALITY SCORE VS. FREE PLAN USABILITY PLOT ➜ Before the graph, output a 40-word <p> describing it: 'Template Library Score (Y-axis, combining quantity & quality assessment) against Free Plan Feature Generosity Score (X-axis)'. Embed using <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Graphic design tool template score vs free plan usability scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Online Design Tools: Templates vs. Free Plan Value [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which tools offer the best free start.",
"8": "RANKING OF ONLINE GRAPHIC DESIGN TOOLS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 tools. Each <li> contains the tool name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word rationale focusing on ease of use for non-designers, template variety, asset library, and value of free/affordable plans. No citations.",
"9": "TOOL STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR BEGINNERS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked tool, create one <li> with ✨ <strong>User-Friendly Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Limitation to Note:</strong> … (total ≤28 words). Base on previously cited material.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & QUICK START TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Online Design Tool for Non-Designers</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning tool and explaining why its balance of intuitive interface, rich templates, and asset library makes it ideal for quick, quality designs. Include the plain text sign-up URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick start tips (e.g., explore template categories, learn basic layering, customize with brand colors/fonts). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Analyze the leading language learning apps focusing on achieving conversational fluency, particularly in popular languages like Spanish, French, or German. Prioritize apps with strong speaking practice components (e.g., AI conversation partners, speech recognition feedback), comprehensive grammar explanations integrated with practical usage, and engaging content that promotes real-world communication. List qualifying apps, detail their teaching methodology, supported languages, subscription costs, and platform availability. Compare them and recommend the best app for a motivated adult learner aiming for practical speaking skills.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & APP INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> of ≈80 words, define the search: keywords “best language app for speaking”, “learn conversational French app”, “AI language tutor Spanish”; sources: language learning blogs, polyglot forums, app store reviews (iOS/Android), academic reviews of language tech; focus: apps with recent updates to speaking tools (last 1-2 years). Explain the challenge of developing spoken fluency via apps. Conclude with an HTML <ul> of exactly four well-known language learning apps, each <li> with app name and a citation.",
"2": "SPEAKING PRACTICE & GRAMMAR FOCUS CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the app offers interactive speaking exercises with feedback AND clear, contextual grammar lessons, or ❌ if weak in one or both. Follow with the app name. Note if AI conversation partners are a feature. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "TEACHING METHODOLOGY & CONTENT VARIETY TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: App | Core Teaching Method (e.g., SRS, Immersive, Gamified, Tutor-led) | Types of Learning Content (e.g., Dialogues, Stories, Videos, Drills). Summarize method and list 2-3 content types. Limit to six apps. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "LANGUAGE SUPPORT & PROGRESS TRACKING SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five apps. Columns: App, Popular Languages Offered (list 3-5 major ones), Proficiency Levels Covered (e.g., A1-C1 CEFR), Progress Metrics & Feedback, Offline Access Availability. For 'Proficiency Levels', note if placement tests are offered. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that CEFR levels are often self-assessed in apps. Cite each detail.",
"5": "SUBSCRIPTION PRICING & PLATFORM TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five apps. Rows per app: Free Version Limitations (if any), Premium Subscription Cost ($/month or $/year), Supported Platforms (iOS, Android, Web). Display prices with $. Close with a <p> (≤30 words) about family plans or lifetime subscription offers if common. Cite all pricing and platform info.",
"6": "NARRATIVE EFFECTIVENESS FOR CONVERSATION & ENGAGEMENT ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing how effectively *each* of the top 3-4 apps develops practical speaking skills, the quality of their speech recognition and feedback, and how engaging their content is for maintaining motivation. Bold the app name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user testimonials or expert reviews.",
"7": "CONVERSATIONAL FEATURE SCORE VS. MONTHLY COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Conversational Practice Feature Score (Y-axis, based on AI chat, speech analysis, real-world scenarios) against Monthly Subscription Cost (X-axis)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Language app conversational score vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Language Apps: Speaking Features vs. Price [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which apps offer strong speaking tools at a good value.",
"8": "RANKING OF LANGUAGE LEARNING APPS (CONVERSATION FOCUS) ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 apps. Each <li> must contain the app name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting effectiveness for speaking, grammar integration, engagement, and overall value for fluency. No citations here.",
"9": "APP STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR SPEAKING ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked app, create one <li> with 🗣️ <strong>Speaking Pro:</strong> … and 📚 <strong>Learning Curve/Content Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & LEARNING STRATEGIES ➜ Insert <h2>Best App for Conversational Fluency</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning app and why its approach to speaking practice, grammar, and motivation makes it ideal for learners prioritizing conversation. Include the plain text app store or homepage URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three learning strategies (e.g., practice speaking daily even if short, don't fear mistakes, supplement with native content). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the top travel backpacks suitable for carry-on only airline travel, focusing on compliance with typical airline size restrictions (e.g., around 40-45L), comfort for carrying (ergonomic straps, back panel), organizational features (laptop sleeve, compartments), durability, and material quality. List qualifying backpacks, detail their exact dimensions and capacity, weight, key materials, specific organizational pockets, pricing, and warranty. Compare them and recommend the best overall carry-on backpack for a frequent traveler seeking a balance of capacity, comfort, and organization.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & BACKPACK INTRODUCTION ➜ In a <p> of ≈80 words, outline the search: keywords “best carry on backpack 40L”, “travel backpack airline compliant”, “comfortable one bag travel backpack”; sources: travel gear review sites, minimalist travel blogs, packing forums (e.g., r/onebag), manufacturer specifications; focus: models known for fitting most airline overheads, reviewed in last 2 years. Explain the benefits of one-bag travel. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable travel backpack brands, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "CARRY-ON COMPLIANCE & CAPACITY CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> indicates ✅ if the backpack's dimensions are generally accepted by major airlines for carry-on (note typical LxWxH in cm/inches) AND capacity is between 35-45L, or ❌ if oversized or too small for substantial one-bag travel. Follow with brand/model. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item for dimensions/capacity.",
"3": "COMFORT & ERGONOMICS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Backpack Model | Shoulder Strap & Hip Belt Features | Back Panel Design & Ventilation. Summarize key ergonomic elements in one sentence per cell. Limit to six top backpacks. Every row must have a citation tag.",
"4": "ORGANIZATION & MATERIAL SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the five strongest contenders. Columns: Model, Main Compartment Access (e.g., Clamshell, Top-loader), Dedicated Laptop Sleeve (Max size?), Key Pockets (e.g., Water bottle, Quick access, Shoe compartment), Primary Material(s) & Water Resistance. For 'Key Pockets', list 2-3 distinct ones. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about how packing cubes can enhance any bag's organization. Cite each specification.",
"5": "WEIGHT, PRICE & WARRANTY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five backpacks. Rows per backpack: Model, Empty Weight (kg/lbs), Typical Price ($/€), Warranty Type (e.g., Lifetime Limited, 5 Years). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤30 words) noting that lighter bags can sometimes compromise on durability or features. Cite all weight, price, and warranty details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE PACKABILITY, DURABILITY & TRAVEL EASE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing how easy it is to pack and access gear, the perceived durability and weather resistance of materials, and the overall comfort and convenience for navigating airports and cities for *each* of the top 3-4 backpacks. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from traveler reviews or gear tests.",
"7": "ORGANIZATION SCORE VS. CARRY COMFORT SCORE PLOT ➜ Before the graph, provide a 40-word <p> describing it: 'Carry Comfort Score (Y-axis, 1-10 from aggregated reviews based on straps, back panel, load distribution) against Organization Feature Score (X-axis, 1-10 based on compartments, access, laptop sleeve)'. Embed using <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Travel backpack comfort vs organization scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Carry-on Backpacks: Comfort vs. Organization [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which backpacks offer a good balance of both.",
"8": "RANKING OF CARRY-ON TRAVEL BACKPACKS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 backpacks. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting carry-on compliance, comfort, organization, durability, and overall suitability for one-bag travel. No citations.",
"9": "BACKPACK PROS & CONS FOR TRAVELERS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked backpack, create one <li> with ✈️ <strong>Travel Advantage:</strong> … and ⚖️ <strong>Weight/Bulk Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & PACKING TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Carry-On Backpack for One-Bag Travel</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning backpack and explaining why its design, features, and comfort make it ideal for efficient and comfortable carry-on travel. Include the plain text official product URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three smart packing tips (e.g., use packing cubes, roll clothes, wear bulkiest items). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Evaluate the best budgeting apps for personal finance management, focusing on ease of transaction tracking (manual and automatic bank sync), categorization features, goal setting, reporting/analytics, and security. List qualifying apps, detail their synchronization capabilities (banks supported in a specific region like US or UK), pricing (free vs. subscription tiers), platform availability (iOS, Android, Web), and any unique features like debt payoff planning or investment tracking. Compare them and recommend the top app for an individual seeking better control over their finances.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & APP INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), describe the search: keywords “best budgeting app personal finance”, “automatic expense tracker app US”, “free budget planner UK”; sources: personal finance blogs, tech review sites specializing in fintech, app store user reviews, official app documentation; specify target region (e.g., US or UK) for bank sync relevance; timeframe: last 12-18 months. Explain the value of digital budgeting. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four well-known budgeting apps, each <li> with app name and a citation.",
"2": "BANK SYNC & CATEGORIZATION CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the app offers reliable automatic bank/credit card syncing (for the target region) AND customizable spending categories, or ❌ if manual entry is primary or categorization is rigid. Follow with the app name. Note if automatic categorization is generally accurate. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "BUDGETING & GOAL SETTING FEATURES TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: App | Budget Creation Method (e.g., Zero-based, 50/30/20, Custom) | Goal Setting & Tracking Features. Summarize method and list 2-3 goal features (e.g., Savings goals, Debt reduction progress). Limit to six apps. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "REPORTING & ADVANCED FINANCE TOOLS SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five apps. Columns: App, Types of Financial Reports (e.g., Spending by category, Net worth, Cash flow), Bill Reminders/Management, Investment Tracking (Yes/No/Basic), Multi-currency Support. For 'Types of Reports', list 2-3 examples. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that investment tracking capabilities vary widely. Cite each feature claim.",
"5": "PRICING, SECURITY & PLATFORM TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five apps. Rows per app: Free Version Features/Limitations, Premium Subscription Cost ($/month or $/year), Security Measures (e.g., Encryption, 2FA), Supported Platforms (iOS, Android, Web). Display prices with $. Close with a <p> (≤30 words) about the importance of strong security for financial apps. Cite all pricing, security, and platform info.",
"6": "NARRATIVE EASE OF USE & FINANCIAL INSIGHTS ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the intuitiveness of the interface for daily transaction management, the clarity and actionability of financial reports and insights, and how well *each* of the top 3-4 apps helps users understand and improve their financial habits. Bold the app name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user experience reviews or financial advisor recommendations.",
"7": "USER-FRIENDLINESS SCORE VS. ANNUAL COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Overall User-Friendliness Score (Y-axis, 1-10 from aggregated reviews covering UI, bank sync, categorization) against Annual Subscription Cost (X-axis, $0 for free apps)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Budgeting app user-friendliness vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Budgeting Apps: Ease of Use vs. Price [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which apps offer a great user experience at a reasonable (or no) cost.",
"8": "RANKING OF BUDGETING APPS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 apps. Each <li> must contain the app name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting ease of tracking, budgeting flexibility, insightful reporting, and overall value for personal finance management. No citations here.",
"9": "APP STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR BUDGETING ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked app, create one <li> with 💰 <strong>Budgeting Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Potential Issue:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., bank sync reliability, learning curve). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & GETTING STARTED TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best App for Personal Budgeting Control</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning app and why its combination of features, usability, and insightful analytics makes it ideal for taking charge of personal finances. Include the plain text app store or homepage URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three getting started tips (e.g., connect primary accounts, review initial categorization, set one realistic budget goal). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Analyze the top weather apps for mobile devices (iOS and Android) that provide highly accurate hyperlocal forecasting, detailed radar imagery, severe weather alerts, and a user-friendly interface. Consider apps with robust free versions as well as premium offerings. List qualifying apps, detail their key forecasting technologies or data sources, specific features (e.g., hourly forecasts, air quality index, UV index), customization options, and pricing for premium features. Compare them and recommend the best overall weather app for a user needing reliable and detailed local weather information.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & WEATHER APP INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> of ≈75 words, outline the search: keywords “best hyperlocal weather app”, “accurate weather forecast iOS”, “detailed radar weather app Android”; sources: tech review sites specializing in apps, meteorology blogs that evaluate forecast accuracy, app store user reviews, discussions in weather enthusiast forums; timeframe: features and accuracy ratings within the last year. Explain the demand for precise local weather. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four popular weather apps, each <li> with app name and a citation.",
"2": "HYPERLOCAL ACCURACY & RADAR CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the app is frequently cited for strong hyperlocal accuracy AND offers high-resolution, interactive radar maps, or ❌ if general in forecasts or radar is basic. Follow with the app name. Note if it uses specific advanced models like HRRR or hyperlocal station networks. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "FORECASTING DATA & SEVERE WEATHER ALERTS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: App | Primary Data Source(s)/Model(s) (e.g., NOAA, ECMWF, Proprietary blend) | Severe Weather Alert Capabilities (Types, Customization). Summarize data sources and detail alert features. Limit to six apps. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "DETAILED WEATHER INFO & CUSTOMIZATION SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five apps. Columns: App, Hourly/Minute-by-Minute Forecasts, Additional Data Points (e.g., AQI, UV Index, Pollen, Wind), Widget Options, Interface Customization. For 'Additional Data Points', list 2-3 notable ones. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that data point availability can vary by location. Cite each feature claim.",
"5": "FREE VS. PREMIUM & PRICING TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five apps. Rows per app: Key Free Version Features, Premium Features (e.g., Ad-free, Advanced radar, Longer forecasts), Premium Subscription Cost ($/month or $/year). Display prices with $. Close with a <p> (≤30 words) about whether premium significantly enhances core forecast accuracy or mostly adds convenience. Cite all pricing and feature differences.",
"6": "NARRATIVE USER INTERFACE & INFORMATION ACCESSIBILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the clarity and intuitiveness of the user interface, how easily users can access detailed weather information (like radar or hourly data), and the overall visual appeal and performance of *each* of the top 3-4 apps. Bold the app name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from app usability reviews or user feedback.",
"7": "FORECAST ACCURACY SCORE VS. PREMIUM COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Aggregated Forecast Accuracy Score (Y-axis, 1-10 from reviews and comparative tests) against Annual Premium Subscription Cost (X-axis, $0 for free-focused apps)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Weather app accuracy vs premium cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Weather Apps: Accuracy vs. Premium Price [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which apps offer top accuracy, whether free or paid.",
"8": "RANKING OF WEATHER APPS (HYPERLOCAL FOCUS) ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 apps. Each <li> must contain the app name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting hyperlocal accuracy, detailed radar, alert system reliability, and user interface quality. No citations here.",
"9": "APP STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR LOCAL WEATHER ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked app, create one <li> with 🌦️ <strong>Forecasting Pro:</strong> … and UI/UX <strong>Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & CUSTOMIZATION TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best App for Reliable Local Weather</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning app and why its combination of hyperlocal accuracy, detailed information, and user-friendly design makes it ideal for daily weather needs. Include the plain text app store link. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three customization tips (e.g., set preferred locations, customize alert notifications, explore different map layers). Add one citation for the app link."
}
|
Identify the best noise-cancelling headphones suitable for daily commuters, focusing on models released in the last 18 months with excellent battery life (15+ hours) and comfort for long wear. List all qualifying brands and models, detail their audio specifications, noise cancellation capabilities, battery performance, connectivity options, and full pricing (MSRP, typical street price, any subscription for extra features). Compare the offers and recommend the single best-value option for a commuter prioritizing sound quality and effective noise reduction.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH STRATEGY & INTRODUCTION ➜ Inside one <p>, describe the search methodology using keywords like “best commuter noise cancelling headphones 2024”, “long battery life ANC headphones”, filtering for reviews and product releases in the last 18 months from tech review sites, audiophile forums, and major retailers. Explain why both over-ear and in-ear models might be considered. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four prominent brands discovered, each <li> containing the brand name and one citation tag.",
"2": "CORE FEATURE CHECKLIST (ANC & BATTERY) ➜ Produce an HTML unordered list (<ul>) where each <li> indicates ✅ if the model offers Active Noise Cancellation and 15+ hours battery, or ❌ otherwise, followed by the brand and model name. If a specific figure is notable (e.g., “30 hours battery”), include it in parentheses. Limit to a maximum of ten <li> elements; include one citation per item.",
"3": "COMFORT & CONNECTIVITY TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (with <thead> and <tbody>) with three columns: Model | Comfort Features | Connectivity Options (Bluetooth version, multipoint, codecs). For 'Comfort Features', describe key aspects like earcup material or lightweight design in one sentence. Limit to six top models. Each cell in the body should be a concise statement, and every row must have a citation tag.",
"4": "AUDIO SPECS TABLE ➜ Build an HTML table listing the five strongest contenders with columns: Model, Driver Size (mm), Frequency Response (Hz), Key Audio Tech (e.g., LDAC, aptX HD, Spatial Audio), Impedance (Ohms). Numeric cells should be right-aligned using <td style=\"text-align:right;\">. After the </table>, add a 30-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> if any spec is vendor-claimed but not independently verified. Cite every numeric cell.",
"5": "PRICING & AVAILABILITY TABLE ➜ Create another HTML table for the same five models. Each model gets two stacked rows (MSRP, Typical Street Price); show prices using $ (USD). Add a third column for 'Availability Notes' (e.g., 'Widely available', 'Check specialist retailers'). Close the table, then add one <p> (≤25 words) about potential seasonal discounts. Cite every price.",
"6": "NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS ➜ Write ≈120 words inside a single <p> weaving together the audio quality, noise cancellation effectiveness, comfort, and price for *each* of the top 3-4 models. Bold the model name on first mention with <strong>…</strong>. Insert at least two inline citations, for instance, referencing a review that comments on ANC performance.",
"7": "COMPARATIVE BAR CHART (BATTERY VS ANC RATING) ➜ Before the chart, output a 40-word <p> describing it: 'Battery Life (hours) on Y-axis, Subjective ANC Effectiveness Score (1-10 from reviews) on X-axis'. Then embed the image with <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Headphones battery vs ANC rating bar chart\"> followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Commuter headphones: battery life vs. noise cancellation [citation]</figcaption>. Finish with one sentence interpreting which models offer the best balance.",
"8": "RANKING LIST ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 models. Each <li> contains the model name, an em-dash (—) and a 15-word rationale focusing on its suitability for commuters (e.g., balance of ANC, comfort, portability, and call quality). No citations here.",
"9": "STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES ➜ Output an unordered list (<ul>). For every ranked model, make one <li> that contains 🎧 <strong>Sound Pro:</strong> … and 📉 <strong>Drawback:</strong> … (≤25 words total). No new data or citations.",
"10": "FINAL PICK & USAGE TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Top Commuter Choice</h2>, then a 70-word recommendation paragraph in a <p>. Include the official product page URL as plain text. Follow with an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of three quick tips (e.g., proper earcup seal, exploring companion app settings, safe listening volumes in transit). End with one citation that supports the product URL."
}
|
Find the top Python IDEs specifically tailored for data science and machine learning tasks, considering features like Jupyter integration, debugging tools, variable explorers, and VCS support. List all suitable IDEs, detail their key data science features, compatibility (OS, Python versions), pricing (free, freemium, paid subscription tiers), and community support. Compare them and recommend the best overall IDE for a data scientist working on complex projects.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH APPROACH & IDE INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> of ≈70 words, detail the search method: keywords like “Python IDE data science”, “best ML development environment”, “Jupyter support IDE”; sources like developer surveys, specialized tech blogs, and official IDE documentation; date range: last 2 years. Explain the importance of features like notebook support. Finish with an HTML <ul> with exactly four <li> items, each naming a prominent IDE and a citation for its relevance.",
"2": "KEY DATA SCIENCE FEATURE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ or ❌ for built-in Jupyter/notebook support, followed by the IDE name, and in parentheses, notes on other key features like integrated terminal or Conda environment management. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "COMPATIBILITY & DEBUGGING TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (with <thead> and <tbody>) with columns: IDE, Supported OS, Python Version Compatibility, Advanced Debugging Features. For 'Advanced Debugging Features', summarize in one sentence (e.g., “Visual debugger, breakpoints, step-through”). Limit to six IDEs. Add a citation tag to every row. Use <td style=\"text-align:center;\"> for 'Supported OS' and 'Python Version Compatibility' columns.",
"4": "DETAILED FEATURE MATRIX ➜ Construct an HTML table for the five most feature-rich IDEs. Columns: IDE, Variable Explorer, VCS Integration (Git, etc.), Plotting/Visualization Tools, Extensibility (Plugins). Provide brief descriptions or yes/no in cells. After the </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> if a feature relies heavily on plugins. Cite each feature claim.",
"5": "PRICING & SUPPORT MODEL TABLE ➜ Build another HTML table for the same five IDEs. Each IDE gets rows for: Licensing Model (Open Source, Freemium, Subscription), Price (if applicable, e.g., $/month or Free), Community Support (Forum, Docs, etc.), Paid Support Options. Display prices with $. Close the table, then add a <p> (≤30 words) noting differences between free and paid versions if applicable. Cite all pricing and support information.",
"6": "NARRATIVE FEATURE & USABILITY SYNTHESIS ➜ Write ≈130 words in a single <p> discussing the user experience, data science workflow integration, and specific toolsets of *each* of the top 3-4 IDEs. Bold the IDE name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Include at least two inline citations pointing to user reviews or feature documentation.",
"7": "IDE POPULARITY VS. FEATURE SCORE PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing the plot: 'Developer Community Popularity Score (Y-axis, derived from surveys/mentions) against a composite Data Science Feature Score (X-axis)'. Embed using <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Python IDE popularity vs feature score scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Data Science IDEs: popularity vs. feature richness [citation]</figcaption>. Add one sentence below the figure interpreting any clusters or outliers.",
"8": "RANKING OF IDES ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 IDEs. Each <li> includes the IDE name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification considering its data science capabilities, ease of use, and ecosystem. No citations.",
"9": "ADVANTAGES & LIMITATIONS SUMMARY ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked IDE, create one <li> with 💡 <strong>Key Strength:</strong> … and ⚠️ <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (total ≤28 words). Base points on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & GETTING STARTED ➜ Insert <h2>Preferred IDE for Data Science</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winner and explaining why its blend of features, usability, and support makes it ideal for data scientists. Include the official download/project page URL as plain text. Conclude with an HTML <ol> of three setup tips (e.g., configuring Python interpreter, installing key data science plugins, customizing keyboard shortcuts). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the leading project management software for small agile teams (2-10 users), prioritizing ease of use, Kanban/Scrum board functionality, task tracking, collaboration features, and integration capabilities (e.g., Slack, GitHub). List relevant software, detail their agile-specific tools, pricing tiers for small teams, free trial availability, and primary platform (web, desktop, mobile). Compare them and recommend the best option for a startup aiming for efficient agile workflows.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & SOFTWARE INTRODUCTION ➜ In a <p> of ≈80 words, define the search parameters: keywords like “agile project management tools small teams”, “Kanban software startup”, “Scrum tools for 10 users”; sources: software review sites (G2, Capterra), agile methodology blogs, official product pages; focus: tools with strong adoption in the last 2-3 years. Explain the importance of agile boards. Conclude with an HTML <ul> of exactly four well-known PM tools suited for agile, each <li> with the tool name and a citation.",
"2": "AGILE METHODOLOGY SUPPORT CHECKLIST ➜ Generate an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the software explicitly supports both Kanban and Scrum boards, or lists which it supports (e.g., “Kanban only”), followed by the software name. Note if features like burndown charts or sprint planning are native. Limit to eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "COLLABORATION & INTEGRATION TABLE ➜ Create an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Software | Key Collaboration Features (e.g., @mentions, file sharing, comments) | Core Integrations (e.g., Slack, Google Drive, GitHub). Summarize features and list 2-3 key integrations. Limit to six tools. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "TASK MANAGEMENT & REPORTING SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five tools. Columns: Software, Task Customization (custom fields, statuses), Time Tracking, Reporting Dashboards (types of reports), Mobile App Availability (iOS/Android). For 'Reporting Dashboards', list 2-3 examples. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> if some advanced reporting is locked behind higher tiers. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING FOR SMALL TEAMS & TRIALS TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five tools. Rows per tool: Free Tier (if any, user/project limits), Paid Tier for ~5 Users (Price $/month), Trial Period (days). Display prices with $. If pricing is per user, specify. Close the table, then add a <p> (≤30 words) about common limitations of free tiers or trial periods. Cite all pricing information.",
"6": "NARRATIVE USABILITY & WORKFLOW SYNTHESIS ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the ease of setup, daily usability for agile ceremonies (stand-ups, retrospectives), and overall workflow efficiency for *each* of the top 3-4 tools. Bold the software name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews or case studies.",
"7": "AGILITY SCORE VS. PRICE PER USER PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Agility Feature Score (Y-axis, based on Kanban/Scrum support, reporting, etc.) against Monthly Price Per User (X-axis)'. Embed the image: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Agile PM software agility vs price scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Agile PM Tools: Feature Score vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which tools offer high agile functionality at a reasonable cost.",
"8": "RANKING OF AGILE PM TOOLS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 tools. Each <li> must contain the software name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification focusing on agile feature set, user-friendliness for small teams, and value for money. No citations here.",
"9": "KEY BENEFITS & POTENTIAL ISSUES ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked tool, create one <li> with ✨ <strong>Main Advantage:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Watch Out For:</strong> … (total ≤28 words). Base these on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & IMPLEMENTATION TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Agile PM Tool for Startups</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning software and why its specific agile features, collaboration tools, and pricing model make it optimal for a small, growing startup. Include the plain text sign-up/homepage URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick implementation tips (e.g., conduct a team onboarding session, set up first sprint board, integrate with one key communication tool). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Analyze and compare the top cloud storage providers for individuals or families focusing on photo and video backup. Key criteria include storage capacity per dollar, ease of automatic backup from mobile and desktop, photo/video organization features (e.g., AI tagging, albums), sharing capabilities, and security (encryption, 2FA). List providers, detail their relevant plans, full pricing, and any limitations. Recommend the best overall service for secure and convenient family media backup.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH FOCUS & PROVIDER INTRODUCTION ➜ Inside a <p> of ≈70 words, outline the search strategy: keywords such as “best cloud storage for photos family”, “automatic photo backup service”, “secure cloud video storage”; sources: tech comparison sites, photography blogs, user testimonials, provider T&Cs; timeframe: latest features and pricing from the past 12 months. Emphasize the need for cross-platform compatibility. End with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four major cloud storage providers, each <li> with the provider name and a citation.",
"2": "AUTO-BACKUP & PLATFORM SUPPORT CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the provider offers automatic mobile (iOS & Android) and desktop (Win/Mac) backup, or ❌ for specific missing platforms, followed by the provider name. Note if RAW photo support is explicitly mentioned. Limit to eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "ORGANIZATION & SHARING FEATURES TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Provider | Photo/Video Organization Tools (e.g., AI tagging, albums, timeline view) | Sharing Options (e.g., shared albums, link expiry, password protection). Summarize key tools and options in one sentence per cell. Limit to six providers. Every row must have a citation tag.",
"4": "STORAGE PLANS & SECURITY SPECS TABLE ➜ Build an HTML table for the five most suitable providers/plans. Columns: Provider/Plan Name, Storage Capacity (GB/TB), Security Features (e.g., End-to-End Encryption option, 2FA type), File Size Limit. Numeric cells use <td style=\"text-align:right;\">. After </table>, add a 30-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> if E2EE is a premium or opt-in feature. Cite all data points.",
"5": "PRICING & FAMILY PLAN OPTIONS TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five providers/plans. Rows for each: Base Price (e.g., $/month or $/year for a specific capacity like 2TB), Family Plan Details (if available: cost, users, pooled storage?), Cost per TB (calculated, for comparison). Show prices in $. Conclude with a <p> (≤25 words) about introductory offers vs. renewal rates. Cite all pricing.",
"6": "NARRATIVE EASE OF USE & VALUE SYNTHESIS ➜ Write ≈125 words in one <p> discussing the user-friendliness of the backup process, the intuitiveness of the organizational tools, and the overall value proposition for families for *each* of the top 3-4 providers. Bold the provider name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations (e.g., one for a security feature, one for a pricing claim).",
"7": "STORAGE COST EFFICIENCY PLOT ➜ Before the graph, provide a 40-word <p> explaining the plot: 'Annual Cost per Terabyte (Y-axis) against Total Storage Offered in Terabytes (X-axis) for comparable plans'. Embed with <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Cloud storage cost per TB vs total storage scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Cloud Storage: Cost Efficiency for Media Backup [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence highlighting providers in the best value quadrant.",
"8": "RANKING OF PHOTO BACKUP SERVICES ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 services. Each <li> must contain the provider name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification focusing on backup reliability, ease of use for families, organizational features, and cost-effectiveness. No citations.",
"9": "SERVICE HIGHLIGHTS & DRAWBACKS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked service, create one <li> with ✅ <strong>Strong Point:</strong> … and ⚠️ <strong>Limitation:</strong> … (total ≤27 words). Base on prior cited material.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & BEST PRACTICES ➜ Insert <h2>Best Cloud Storage for Family Photos/Videos</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning service and explaining why its combination of storage, features, security, and price is ideal for family media. Include the plain text sign-up URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three best practice tips (e.g., enable 2FA immediately, verify initial backup completeness, understand sharing permissions). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the top VPN services optimized for streaming geo-restricted content from platforms like Netflix (various regions), BBC iPlayer, and Hulu, while maintaining good connection speeds and strong privacy features. List qualifying VPN providers, detail their server network (especially in key streaming countries), streaming performance claims, simultaneous connections allowed, pricing for long-term plans, and money-back guarantee policies. Compare them and recommend the best VPN for a user whose primary goal is reliable international streaming.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH STRATEGY & VPN INTRODUCTION ➜ In a <p> of ≈75 words, outline the search: keywords “best VPN for streaming Netflix”, “fast VPN BBC iPlayer”, “geo-unblocking VPN Hulu”; sources: VPN review sites, speed test analyses, user forums discussing streaming success, provider websites; focus on updates within the last 6-12 months due to the cat-and-mouse nature of VPN blocking. Briefly mention why not all VPNs work for streaming. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four well-known VPN providers, each <li> with provider name and a citation.",
"2": "STREAMING PLATFORM UNBLOCKING CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> indicates ✅ if the VPN reliably unblocks US Netflix, UK Netflix, and BBC iPlayer, or lists specific successes/failures (e.g., “✅ US Netflix, ⚠️ BBC iPlayer inconsistent”), followed by the provider name. Limit to eight <li> entries; one citation per item based on recent tests/reviews.",
"3": "SPEED & SERVER NETWORK TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Provider | Average Speed Test Result (e.g., % of baseline speed on US/UK servers) | Key Server Locations for Streaming (e.g., USA, UK, Canada, Japan). Summarize speed impact and list 3-4 key countries. Limit to six top VPNs. Each row needs a citation tag.",
"4": "PRIVACY & USABILITY FEATURES TABLE ➜ Build an HTML table for the five strongest contenders. Columns: Provider, Logging Policy (e.g., No-logs audited), Kill Switch Feature, Simultaneous Connections, Supported Platforms (Win, Mac, iOS, Android, FireTV). Numeric cells (connections) use <td style=\"text-align:right;\">. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about the importance of an audited no-logs policy. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING & GUARANTEE TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five VPNs. Rows per provider: Long-Term Plan (e.g., 2-year plan), Price per Month (on long-term plan, in $), Money-Back Guarantee (days). Show prices in $. Close the table, then add a <p> (≤30 words) advising to check specific terms of money-back guarantees. Cite all pricing and policy information.",
"6": "NARRATIVE STREAMING PERFORMANCE & RELIABILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the consistency of unblocking major streaming services, observed video quality (HD/4K capable?), and connection stability for *each* of the top 3-4 VPNs. Bold the provider name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from streaming tests or user feedback.",
"7": "STREAMING RELIABILITY VS. EFFECTIVE MONTHLY COST PLOT ➜ Before the graph, provide a 40-word <p> describing it: 'Streaming Unblocking Score (Y-axis, based on success with multiple platforms) against Effective Monthly Cost on a long-term plan (X-axis)'. Embed using <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"VPN streaming score vs monthly cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – VPNs: Streaming Performance vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence identifying VPNs that offer high reliability at a good price point.",
"8": "RANKING OF VPNs FOR STREAMING ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 VPNs. Each <li> contains the provider name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification focusing on its ability to unblock content, maintain speed, and offer good value. No citations here.",
"9": "KEY ADVANTAGES & POTENTIAL DOWNSIDES ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked VPN, create one <li> with 🎬 <strong>Streaming Pro:</strong> … and ⚠️ <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (total ≤28 words). Base on previously cited facts.",
"10": "TOP VPN PICK & OPTIMIZATION TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best VPN for International Streaming</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning VPN and explaining why its server network, unblocking capabilities, and speed make it ideal for streamers. Include the plain text sign-up URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three optimization tips (e.g., select servers closest to the desired content region, try different protocols if one fails, clear browser cache/cookies). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Analyze the best meal kit delivery services in the UK for busy professionals, focusing on variety of meal options (including dietary accommodations like vegetarian, low-calorie), ease and speed of preparation (under 30-40 minutes), ingredient quality, and cost per serving. List qualifying services, detail their plan structures, pricing per week for 2 people (3-4 meals), delivery areas, and flexibility (skipping weeks, cancelling). Compare them and recommend the service offering the best balance of convenience, quality, and value.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH APPROACH & SERVICE INTRODUCTION ➜ In a <p> of ≈80 words, describe the search: keywords “UK meal kit review busy professional”, “quick healthy meal delivery UK”, “vegetarian meal box comparison”; sources: food blogs, consumer review sites (Trustpilot UK), national newspaper lifestyle sections, provider websites; focus on services with good recent reviews (last 12 months). Briefly explain the appeal for time-poor individuals. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four popular UK meal kit services, each <li> with the service name and a citation.",
"2": "DIETARY OPTIONS & PREP TIME CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the service offers clear vegetarian options AND most meals are under 40 mins prep/cook time, or notes limitations (e.g., “Limited veggie, some meals 45min+”), followed by the service name. Note if low-calorie or other specific dietary filters are prominent. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "MEAL VARIETY & INGREDIENT SOURCING TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Service | Typical Weekly Meal Choices (Number, Cuisine Types) | Ingredient Sourcing Policy (e.g., British produce, organic options, free-range). Summarize choices and sourcing in one sentence per cell. Limit to six services. Every row must have a citation tag.",
"4": "PLAN STRUCTURE & FLEXIBILITY SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the five most promising services. Columns: Service, Min/Max Meals per Week, Min/Max Servings per Meal, Skip/Cancel Policy (notice period?), Delivery Coverage (e.g., UK Mainland, specific exclusions). For 'Skip/Cancel Policy', summarize key terms. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about checking specific postcodes for delivery. Cite each detail.",
"5": "PRICING PER SERVING & DELIVERY COSTS TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five services. Rows per service: Price for 3 Meals/2 People (per week, in £), Calculated Cost per Serving (£), Delivery Fee (£, or free threshold). Show prices in £. Close the table, then add a <p> (≤30 words) about introductory discounts and their impact on long-term cost. Cite all pricing.",
"6": "NARRATIVE TASTE, CONVENIENCE & QUALITY SYNTHESIS ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the perceived taste and quality of ingredients, the actual convenience of preparation (including clarity of recipe cards), and overall user experience for *each* of the top 3-4 services. Bold the service name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews or food critic articles.",
"7": "COST PER SERVING VS. RECIPE RATING PLOT ➜ Before the graph, provide a 40-word <p> explaining it: 'Average User Recipe Rating (Y-axis, scale of 1-5 from reviews) against Average Cost per Serving (X-axis)'. Embed using <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Meal kit recipe rating vs cost per serving scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – UK Meal Kits: Quality vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence identifying services in the high-rating, reasonable-cost quadrant.",
"8": "RANKING OF MEAL KIT SERVICES ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 services. Each <li> must contain the service name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification focusing on meal variety, ease for busy schedules, ingredient quality, and overall value. No citations here.",
"9": "SERVICE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked service, create one <li> with 👍 <strong>Key Benefit:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (total ≤28 words). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & GETTING STARTED TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Meal Kit for Busy UK Professionals</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning service and explaining why its combination of quick, tasty meals, dietary options, and flexible plans is ideal for professionals. Include the plain text sign-up URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three tips for new users (e.g., check weekly menu in advance, note delivery day/time, organize fridge space for ingredients). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the top electric standing desks suitable for home offices, focusing on stability at height, ease of adjustment (memory presets), weight capacity (to support multiple monitors and accessories), and overall build quality within a mid-range budget (e.g., $400-$800). List qualifying desks, detail their dimensions, height range, motor type (single/dual), material/finish options, warranty, and current pricing. Compare them and recommend the best standing desk for a user seeking a balance of ergonomics, durability, and value.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH APPROACH & DESK INTRODUCTION ➜ In a <p> (≈75 words), outline the search: keywords “best electric standing desk home office”, “stable adjustable height desk”, “dual motor standing desk review”; sources: ergonomic furniture review sites, YouTube reviewers, user forums (e.g., r/StandingDesk), manufacturer specs; timeframe: models popular/released in last 2 years. Briefly discuss ergonomic benefits. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable standing desk brands, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "STABILITY & ADJUSTMENT CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> indicates ✅ if the desk is known for good stability at max height AND offers memory presets, or notes concerns (e.g., “⚠️ Some wobble reported, 2 presets only”), followed by the brand/model. Note if dual motors are standard. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from reviews or specs.",
"3": "DIMENSIONS & ERGONOMICS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Desk Model | Common Desktop Sizes (e.g., WxD in inches/cm) | Height Range (min-max in inches/cm) | Controller Type (e.g., buttons + display, memory presets). Provide 1-2 common sizes. Limit to six top desks. Every row requires a citation tag.",
"4": "BUILD QUALITY & CAPACITY SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the five strongest contenders. Columns: Model, Frame Material, Motor Type (Single/Dual), Lift Capacity (lbs/kg), Assembly Difficulty (e.g., Easy, Moderate, Pro recommended). Numeric cells (capacity) use <td style=\"text-align:right;\">. After </table>, add a 30-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about desktop material options affecting price/durability. Cite each specification.",
"5": "PRICING & WARRANTY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five desks. Rows per desk: Base Price (for a common size, in $), Desktop Included? (Yes/No/Optional), Frame Warranty (years), Motor Warranty (years). Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) about potential shipping costs or optional accessory costs. Cite all pricing/warranty details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE PERFORMANCE & VALUE SYNTHESIS ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the smoothness and noise of height adjustment, stability during typing at standing height, and overall perceived build quality versus price for *each* of the top 3-4 desks. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user experience reviews.",
"7": "STABILITY RATING VS. PRICE PLOT ➜ Before the graph, provide a 40-word <p> explaining it: 'Subjective Stability Rating at Standing Height (Y-axis, scale 1-10 from reviews) against Price for a standard configuration (X-axis)'. Embed using <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Standing desk stability vs price scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Standing Desks: Stability vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which desks offer high stability without excessive cost.",
"8": "RANKING OF STANDING DESKS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 desks. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification focusing on stability, adjustment range/features, build quality, and value for home office use. No citations.",
"9": "KEY FEATURES & CONSIDERATIONS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked desk, create one <li> with 💪 <strong>Strong Suit:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Keep in Mind:</strong> … (total ≤28 words). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP PICK & ERGONOMIC SETUP TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Standing Desk for Home Office</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning desk and explaining why its combination of stability, features, and price point makes it ideal for a productive home office. Include the plain text URL to the product page. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three ergonomic setup tips (e.g., monitor at eye level, keyboard/mouse at elbow height, alternate sitting/standing). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Find the best portable SSDs for creative professionals who frequently work with large video or photo files on the go. Prioritize transfer speeds (read/write MB/s), durability (shock/water resistance if applicable), capacity options (1TB minimum), and interface (Thunderbolt, USB 3.2 Gen 2x2). List qualifying SSDs, detail their performance specs, physical characteristics, pricing per TB, and warranty. Compare them and recommend the top choice for a video editor needing fast, reliable external storage.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & SSD INTRODUCTION ➜ In a <p> of ≈75 words, define the search criteria: keywords “best portable SSD video editing”, “fast external SSD for photographers”, “Thunderbolt portable SSD 1TB+”; sources: tech hardware review sites, professional videography/photography forums, manufacturer benchmarks; focus: models released/reviewed in the last 18 months. Highlight the need for speed in creative workflows. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four leading brands in portable SSDs, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "SPEED & INTERFACE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the SSD offers read speeds over 1000 MB/s AND has at least a USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface, or notes lower specs (e.g., “~500MB/s, USB 3.1 Gen 1”), followed by the brand/model. Note if Thunderbolt is an option. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from spec sheets or reviews.",
"3": "PERFORMANCE & DURABILITY TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: SSD Model | Max Sequential Read/Write (MB/s) | Durability Features (e.g., IP rating, drop protection) | Interface Type(s). Provide both read and write speeds. Limit to six top SSDs. Every row must have a citation tag.",
"4": "PHYSICAL SPECS & CAPACITY OPTIONS ➜ Build an HTML table for the five strongest contenders. Columns: Model, Available Capacities (e.g., 1TB, 2TB, 4TB), Dimensions (LxWxH in mm), Weight (grams), Included Cables. Numeric cells (weight) use <td style=\"text-align:right;\">. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> noting that actual speeds can vary by system. Cite each specification.",
"5": "PRICING PER TB & WARRANTY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five SSDs. Rows per SSD: Price for 1TB/2TB model (in $), Calculated Price per TB ($/TB), Warranty Period (years). Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤30 words) about how higher capacities often offer better $/TB value. Cite all pricing and warranty information.",
"6": "NARRATIVE REAL-WORLD PERFORMANCE & PORTABILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the observed real-world transfer speeds for large files, the physical ruggedness or compactness, and overall suitability for fieldwork or travel for *each* of the top 3-4 SSDs. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from performance benchmarks or hands-on reviews.",
"7": "PRICE PER TB VS. MAX READ SPEED PLOT ➜ Before the graph, provide a 40-word <p> explaining it: 'Maximum Sequential Read Speed (MB/s) (Y-axis) against Price per Terabyte (X-axis)'. Embed using <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Portable SSD read speed vs price per TB scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Portable SSDs: Speed vs. Cost Efficiency [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence identifying SSDs offering high speeds at a competitive cost per terabyte.",
"8": "RANKING OF PORTABLE SSDs FOR CREATIVES ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 SSDs. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 16-word justification focusing on transfer speed, reliability, portability, and value for creative workloads. No citations.",
"9": "KEY STRENGTHS & POTENTIAL LIMITATIONS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked SSD, create one <li> with 🚀 <strong>Performance Edge:</strong> … and ⚠️ <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (total ≤28 words). Base on previously cited facts.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & USAGE NOTES ➜ Insert <h2>Best Portable SSD for Video Editors</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning SSD and explaining why its speed, capacity options, and reliability make it the best choice for demanding creative tasks. Include the plain text URL to the product page. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three usage tips (e.g., use the correct high-speed cable/port, safely eject drive, consider a backup strategy for critical data). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software for freelancers and solopreneurs, prioritizing ease of use, contact management, deal/pipeline tracking, integration with email/calendar, and affordable pricing for a single user. List qualifying CRMs, detail their core features, pricing plans for individuals, mobile app availability, and customer support. Compare them and recommend the top CRM for a freelancer managing client relationships and sales opportunities effectively.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & CRM INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), define the search strategy: keywords “best CRM freelancers”, “solopreneur CRM affordable”, “simple sales pipeline tool”; sources: software review sites (G2, Capterra, Software Advice), freelancer forums, productivity blogs; timeframe: features and pricing updated in the last 12 months. Explain why CRMs are beneficial for solo businesses. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four CRM platforms known for their suitability for individuals, each <li> with the platform name and a citation.",
"2": "SINGLE-USER AFFORDABILITY & CORE FEATURE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the CRM offers a plan under $30/month for a single user AND includes contact management and deal tracking, or ❌ if primarily team-focused or lacks core features in cheap tiers. Follow with the CRM name. Note if a robust free plan exists. Maximum ten <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "INTEGRATION & COMMUNICATION FEATURES TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: CRM Platform | Email Integration Quality (e.g., 2-way sync, templates, tracking) | Calendar Sync & Task Management. Summarize integration depth and list 1-2 task features. Limit to six CRMs. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "SALES PIPELINE & REPORTING SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five CRMs. Columns: CRM, Customizable Pipeline Stages, Lead Scoring/Management, Basic Reporting Dashboards (e.g., Deals won/lost, Activity reports), Mobile App (iOS/Android). Indicate yes/no or summarize for 'Lead Scoring'. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about advanced reporting usually being on higher tiers. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING FOR INDIVIDUALS & SUPPORT TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five CRMs. Rows per CRM: Free Plan (if any, key limitations), Cheapest Paid Plan for Solo User ($/month), Key Support Options (e.g., Knowledge base, Chat, Email). Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) about trial periods or money-back guarantees. Cite all pricing and support info.",
"6": "NARRATIVE EASE OF USE & WORKFLOW EFFICIENCY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the learning curve, intuitiveness of the interface for managing contacts and deals, and overall impact on a freelancer's daily workflow for *each* of the top 3-4 CRMs. Bold the CRM name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews focusing on freelance use.",
"7": "FEATURE SCORE FOR SOLO USERS VS. MONTHLY COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Freelancer Feature Score (Y-axis, based on contact mgt, deal tracking, email integration, ease of use) against Monthly Cost for Single User (X-axis)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"CRM freelancer feature score vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – CRMs for Freelancers: Features vs. Affordability [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which CRMs offer the best value for solo professionals.",
"8": "RANKING OF CRMS FOR FREELANCERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 CRMs. Each <li> must contain the CRM name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting ease of use, core freelance features (contacts, deals), integrations, and affordability. No citations here.",
"9": "CRM STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR SOLO USE ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked CRM, create one <li> with 👍 <strong>Freelancer Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., complexity, specific feature lack). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & IMPLEMENTATION TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best CRM for Solopreneurs</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning CRM and explaining why its balance of simplicity, essential features, and price makes it ideal for freelancers to manage client relationships. Include the plain text sign-up URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick implementation tips (e.g., import existing contacts, set up your sales pipeline stages, integrate your email). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best email marketing services for bloggers and independent content creators, focusing on ease of use, list building tools (forms, landing pages), automation capabilities (welcome series, segmentation), deliverability, and affordable plans for growing lists (e.g., up to 5,000 subscribers). List qualifying services, detail their features for creators, pricing structures, free plan limitations, and integrations with common blogging platforms. Compare them and recommend the top service for a creator aiming to build and engage an audience.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & EMAIL MARKETING INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search strategy: keywords “best email marketing for bloggers”, “content creator email platform”, “affordable email automation for small lists”; sources: marketing blogs, creator economy forums, software review sites, official service documentation; timeframe: focus on features and pricing relevant in the last 12-18 months. Explain the importance of email lists for creators. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four email marketing services popular with creators, each <li> with the service name and a citation.",
"2": "LIST BUILDING & FREE PLAN CHECKLIST FOR CREATORS ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the service offers easy-to-embed signup forms AND a usable free plan for small lists (e.g., up to 1,000 subscribers), or ❌ if list building is cumbersome or free plan is too restrictive. Follow with the service name. Note if landing page builders are included in free/low-cost tiers. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "AUTOMATION & SEGMENTATION FEATURES TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Service | Key Automation Features (e.g., Welcome series, Abandoned cart for digital products) | Audience Segmentation Options. Summarize automation capabilities and list 2-3 segmentation criteria (e.g., Tag-based, Engagement). Limit to six services. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "EMAIL EDITOR, DELIVERABILITY & ANALYTICS SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five services. Columns: Service, Email Editor Type (e.g., Drag-and-drop, HTML), Deliverability Reputation (General consensus from reviews), Key Analytics Provided (e.g., Open rates, Click rates, Unsubscribes), Blogging Platform Integrations (e.g., WordPress, Ghost). For 'Deliverability', use review summaries. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about how sender reputation also impacts deliverability. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING FOR GROWING LISTS & SUPPORT TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five services. Rows per service: Free Plan Subscriber/Send Limits, Price for ~2,500 Subscribers ($/month), Price for ~5,000 Subscribers ($/month), Support Channels. Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on how pricing often scales with list size or send volume. Cite all pricing and support details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE EASE OF USE & CAMPAIGN EFFECTIVENESS ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the intuitiveness of the platform for designing emails and setting up automations, the perceived effectiveness in engaging subscribers (based on creator feedback), and overall user experience for *each* of the top 3-4 services. Bold the service name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from creator case studies or marketing reviews.",
"7": "CREATOR FEATURE SCORE VS. COST AT 5K SUBSCRIBERS PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Creator-Focused Feature Score (Y-axis, based on list building, automation, ease of use) against Monthly Cost for 5,000 Subscribers (X-axis)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Email marketing creator score vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Email Marketing for Creators: Features vs. Scaled Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which services offer the best feature set as a list grows.",
"8": "RANKING OF EMAIL MARKETING SERVICES FOR CREATORS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 services. Each <li> must contain the service name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting ease of use, list growth tools, automation for engagement, and creator-friendly pricing. No citations here.",
"9": "SERVICE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR BLOGGERS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked service, create one <li> with ✉️ <strong>Creator Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Consideration:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., learning curve for advanced automation, specific integration lack). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & LIST BUILDING TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Email Service for Content Creators</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning service and explaining why its balance of user-friendliness, powerful features for creators, and scalable pricing is ideal for audience building. Include the plain text sign-up URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick list building tips (e.g., offer a valuable lead magnet, place forms strategically, promote your newsletter consistently). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best video editing software for beginner to intermediate YouTubers and content creators, focusing on an intuitive user interface, core editing features (timeline, trimming, transitions, text overlays), performance on mid-range computers, built-in stock media/effects, and affordable one-time purchase or subscription options. List qualifying software, detail their key features, system requirements, pricing models, and export options suitable for YouTube. Compare them and recommend the top software for a creator starting their video journey.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & VIDEO EDITOR INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best video editing software for YouTubers beginner”, “easy video editor content creator”, “affordable video software YouTube”; sources: tech review sites (PCMag, TechRadar), YouTube creator channels, software forums, official product pages; focus: software balancing features with ease of use, updated in the last 12-18 months. Explain common needs of new video creators. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four video editing software popular among YouTubers, each <li> with software name and a citation.",
"2": "EASE OF USE & CORE YOUTUBE FEATURE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the software offers an intuitive timeline interface AND easy export presets for YouTube (e.g., 1080p, 4K H.264), or ❌ if steep learning curve or complex export. Follow with the software name. Note if a free version or long trial is available. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "EDITING TOOLS & PERFORMANCE TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Software | Key Editing Features (e.g., Multi-track timeline, Color correction, Audio editing) | General Performance/System Requirements (e.g., Smooth on modest hardware, RAM needs). Summarize 2-3 key features and note performance. Limit to six software options. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "EFFECTS, STOCK MEDIA & TEXT TOOLS SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five software. Columns: Software, Built-in Transitions/Effects Library, Stock Media Access (Music, Footage - if any), Text/Title Editor Capabilities, Chroma Key (Green Screen) Quality. For 'Stock Media', indicate if free or paid add-on. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> about third-party plugins often expanding capabilities. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING MODELS & EXPORT OPTIONS TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five software. Rows per software: Pricing Model (Subscription $/month, One-time purchase $), Key Export Formats (beyond YouTube presets), Maximum Resolution Output, Customer Support. Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on considering long-term cost of subscriptions. Cite all pricing and export info.",
"6": "NARRATIVE WORKFLOW SPEED & CREATIVE FLEXIBILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing how quickly a new user can learn to produce a polished YouTube video, the range of creative expression afforded by the tools (without being overwhelming), and the stability of the software during editing for *each* of the top 3-4 options. Bold the software name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from reviews by beginner/intermediate creators.",
"7": "USER-FRIENDLINESS SCORE VS. TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP (1 YEAR) PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Beginner-Friendliness Score (Y-axis, based on UI, learning resources, workflow intuitiveness) against Estimated 1-Year Cost (X-axis, considering subscription or one-time fee)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Video editor friendliness vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Video Editors for YouTubers: Ease of Use vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which software offers the best balance for new creators.",
"8": "RANKING OF VIDEO EDITING SOFTWARE FOR YOUTUBERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 software. Each <li> must contain the software name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting ease of use, essential YouTube editing features, performance, and value for aspiring creators. No citations here.",
"9": "SOFTWARE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR NEW CREATORS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked software, create one <li> with ▶️ <strong>Creator Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Learning/Cost Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., slightly steeper learning curve, subscription model). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & QUICK EDITING TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Video Editor for Aspiring YouTubers</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning software and explaining why its blend of user-friendliness, core features, and affordability is ideal for creators starting out. Include the plain text official download/purchase URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick video editing tips (e.g., learn keyboard shortcuts, use J-cuts and L-cuts for dialogue, keep videos engaging with pacing). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best note-taking apps with robust cross-platform synchronization (desktop, mobile, web), flexible organization (folders, tags, linking), rich text editing capabilities, and collaboration features. Prioritize apps suitable for both personal knowledge management and team projects. List qualifying apps, detail their synchronization mechanisms, organizational paradigms, supported content types (text, images, audio, attachments), pricing for individual and team plans, and security features (e.g., encryption). Compare them and recommend the top all-around note-taking app for versatile users.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & NOTE-TAKING APP INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best cross-platform note app”, “note taking app collaboration”, “PKM app sync”; sources: productivity blogs, tech review sites, forums like r/NoteTaking, app store listings; focus: apps with reliable sync and versatile features, updated in the last year. Explain the diverse needs note-taking apps serve. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four popular cross-platform note-taking apps, each <li> with app name and a citation.",
"2": "CROSS-PLATFORM SYNC & CORE ORGANIZATION CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the app offers seamless sync across major platforms (Win, Mac, iOS, Android, Web) AND supports both folder/notebook and tag-based organization, or ❌ if sync is unreliable or organization is rigid. Follow with the app name. Note if offline access is robust. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "RICH TEXT EDITING & CONTENT SUPPORT TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: App | Rich Text Features (e.g., Markdown, WYSIWYG, tables, code blocks) | Supported Embedded Content (e.g., Images, PDFs, Audio, Web clips). Summarize editor type and list 2-3 content types. Limit to six apps. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "ADVANCED ORGANIZATION & COLLABORATION SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five apps. Columns: App, Linking/Backlinking Capabilities, Search Functionality (Speed, Advanced operators), Real-time Collaboration Features, Version History for Notes. For 'Linking', indicate if bi-directional. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that collaboration features often differ between free and paid tiers. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING (INDIVIDUAL/TEAM) & SECURITY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five apps. Rows per app: Free Plan Limitations, Individual Pro Plan ($/month), Team Plan ($/user/month), Security (e.g., End-to-end encryption option, 2FA). Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on the importance of E2EE for sensitive notes. Cite all pricing and security info.",
"6": "NARRATIVE USER EXPERIENCE & VERSATILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the overall user interface design, the ease of capturing and organizing diverse information, and the app's suitability for different use cases (PKM, project notes, shared knowledge base) for *each* of the top 3-4 apps. Bold the app name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews discussing long-term usability.",
"7": "ORGANIZATIONAL POWER SCORE VS. ANNUAL PRO COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Knowledge Organization Power Score (Y-axis, based on folders, tags, linking, search, content types) against Annual Cost for a Pro/Individual Plan (X-axis)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Note app organization score vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Note-Taking Apps: Organizational Power vs. Price [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which apps offer the best organizational capabilities for the cost.",
"8": "RANKING OF NOTE-TAKING APPS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 apps. Each <li> must contain the app name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting sync reliability, organizational flexibility, rich editing, collaboration, and overall versatility. No citations here.",
"9": "APP STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR KNOWLEDGE WORK ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked app, create one <li> with 📝 <strong>Organization Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Sync/Collaboration Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., occasional sync lag, E2EE only on paid). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & EFFECTIVE NOTE-TAKING TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best All-Around Note-Taking App</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning app and explaining why its blend of robust synchronization, flexible organization, and rich features makes it ideal for managing diverse information. Include the plain text official website/download URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three effective note-taking tips (e.g., establish a consistent organization system, regularly review and prune notes, utilize linking for connections). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best domain name registrars based on transparent pricing (initial registration and renewal costs), ease of use of the domain management interface, quality of customer support, and range of included free services (e.g., WHOIS privacy, email forwarding). List qualifying registrars, detail their pricing for common TLDs (.com, .org, .net), renewal rates, any hidden fees, DNS management features, and security options (e.g., 2FA, domain lock). Compare them and recommend the top registrar for individuals and small businesses seeking a reliable and fair-priced domain partner.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & REGISTRAR INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best domain registrar cheap renewal”, “compare domain name registrars”, “transparent domain pricing WHOIS privacy”; sources: tech blogs, web hosting review sites, ICANN-accredited registrar lists, user forums discussing registrar experiences; focus: registrars with clear pricing and good UI, info from last 12 months. Explain the role of a registrar. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four well-known domain registrars, each <li> with registrar name and a citation.",
"2": "TRANSPARENT PRICING & WHOIS PRIVACY CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the registrar offers clear, upfront pricing for registration AND renewals AND includes free WHOIS privacy for supported TLDs, or ❌ if pricing is deceptive or WHOIS privacy is a costly add-on. Follow with the registrar name. Note if an introductory discount is heavily advertised but renewal is high. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "DOMAIN MANAGEMENT INTERFACE & DNS FEATURES TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Registrar | Ease of Use of Management Panel (User consensus) | Key DNS Management Features (e.g., A, CNAME, MX records, Dynamic DNS). Summarize UI intuitiveness and list 2-3 DNS capabilities. Limit to six registrars. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "CUSTOMER SUPPORT & SECURITY OPTIONS SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five registrars. Columns: Registrar, Support Channels (e.g., 24/7 Chat, Phone, Ticket), Support Responsiveness (Review consensus), Domain Security Features (e.g., 2FA, Domain Lock, Auto-renewal), Email Forwarding (Free?). For 'Support Responsiveness', use terms like Good, Average, Slow. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that support quality can be subjective but trends emerge. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING FOR COMMON TLDS & RENEWAL RATES TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five registrars. Rows per registrar: .com Price (1st year), .com Renewal Price, .org Price (1st year), .org Renewal Price, Any Mandatory ICANN Fee (shown separately?). Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) emphasizing checking renewal rates specifically. Cite all pricing details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE USER EXPERIENCE & TRUSTWORTHINESS ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the overall experience of registering and managing domains, the clarity of billing, the helpfulness of customer support when needed, and the perceived trustworthiness and ethical practices of *each* of the top 3-4 registrars. Bold the registrar name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews or industry watchdogs.",
"7": "TRUST & TRANSPARENCY SCORE VS. AVERAGE .COM RENEWAL COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Trust & Pricing Transparency Score (Y-axis, based on clear renewals, free WHOIS, no aggressive upselling) against Average .COM Renewal Cost (X-axis)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Domain registrar trust score vs renewal cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Domain Registrars: Trust & Transparency vs. Long-term Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which registrars offer the best balance.",
"8": "RANKING OF DOMAIN NAME REGISTRARS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 registrars. Each <li> must contain the registrar name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting transparent pricing (especially renewals), ease of management, free WHOIS privacy, and reliable support. No citations here.",
"9": "REGISTRAR STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked registrar, create one <li> with 👍 <strong>Pricing/Feature Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Support/UI Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., slightly clunky UI, support via ticket only). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & DOMAIN MANAGEMENT TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Domain Registrar for Fair Value</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning registrar and explaining why its combination of transparent pricing, essential freebies, and user-friendly management makes it ideal for securing domain names. Include the plain text official website URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three domain management tips (e.g., enable auto-renewal for critical domains, use strong account security (2FA), keep contact info updated). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best accounting software for UK self-employed individuals (sole traders and freelancers), focusing on Making Tax Digital (MTD) for ITSA compliance, ease of income and expense tracking, invoicing capabilities, bank feed integration, and self-assessment tax return preparation assistance. List qualifying software, detail their UK-specific features, pricing plans for sole traders, mobile app functionality, and customer support. Compare them and recommend the top software for a UK freelancer to manage their finances and tax obligations efficiently.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & UK ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best accounting software UK sole trader MTD”, “freelancer bookkeeping software UK”, “self assessment tax software UK”; sources: UK accounting blogs, HMRC guidance on MTD software, small business forums UK, software review sites with UK focus; timeframe: features and pricing relevant for current/upcoming tax year. Explain MTD for ITSA implications. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four accounting software popular among UK sole traders, each <li> with software name and a citation.",
"2": "MTD COMPLIANCE & CORE BOOKKEEPING CHECKLIST (UK FOCUS) ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the software is HMRC-recognised for MTD for ITSA AND offers robust income/expense tracking with bank feeds, or ❌ if MTD support is unclear or core bookkeeping is weak. Follow with the software name. Note if it supports VAT MTD as well for those who might need it. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item.",
"3": "INVOICING & EXPENSE MANAGEMENT TABLE (UK) ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Software | Invoicing Features (e.g., Custom templates, Payment reminders, Recurring invoices) | Expense Tracking & Receipt Capture (e.g., Mobile app OCR, Mileage tracking). Summarize key features for UK freelancers. Limit to six software options. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "BANK INTEGRATION & TAX PREPARATION SPECS (UK) ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five software. Columns: Software, UK Bank Feed Quality (Major banks supported, Reliability), Self-Assessment Report Generation, MTD for ITSA Submission Process, Mobile App Functionality (iOS/Android). For 'Bank Feed Quality', use review consensus. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that direct submission quality for Self Assessment can vary. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING FOR SOLE TRADERS & SUPPORT (UK) TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five software. Rows per software: Free Plan (if any, limitations for sole traders), Cheapest MTD-Compliant Plan (£/month), Key Support Options (e.g., UK-based phone, Chat, Accountant Partner Program). Show prices in £. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on how some offer discounts for accountants managing multiple clients. Cite all pricing and support info.",
"6": "NARRATIVE EASE OF USE FOR UK TAX & BOOKKEEPING ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the learning curve for UK sole traders, the intuitiveness of managing daily bookkeeping tasks, the helpfulness in preparing for Self Assessment, and overall compliance confidence offered by *each* of the top 3-4 software. Bold the software name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from UK freelancer reviews or accountant recommendations.",
"7": "UK SOLE TRADER SUITABILITY SCORE VS. MONTHLY COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'UK Sole Trader Feature Score (Y-axis, based on MTD, invoicing, bank feeds, tax help, ease of use) against Monthly Cost for a suitable plan (£, X-axis)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"UK accounting software score vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – UK Accounting Software: Sole Trader Suitability vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which software offers the best value for UK freelancers.",
"8": "RANKING OF ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE FOR UK SOLE TRADERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 software. Each <li> must contain the software name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting MTD compliance, ease of bookkeeping, invoicing, tax preparation support, and value for UK freelancers. No citations here.",
"9": "SOFTWARE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES (UK TAX FOCUS) ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked software, create one <li> with 🇬🇧 <strong>UK Tax Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Usability/Cost Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., slightly complex for very simple needs, higher tier for all features). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & UK TAX TIPS FOR FREELANCERS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Accounting Software for UK Self-Employed</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning software and explaining why its balance of MTD compliance, user-friendly bookkeeping, and UK-specific support makes it ideal for sole traders. Include the plain text official website URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick UK tax tips for freelancers (e.g., keep business/personal finances separate, understand allowable expenses, set aside money for tax). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best espresso machines for home baristas under $1000/€1000, focusing on brew quality (temperature stability, pressure consistency), steam wand performance for milk frothing, build quality, and ease of use/maintenance for enthusiasts. List qualifying machines, detail their specifications (boiler type, pump pressure, group head size, grinder inclusion), key features (PID, pre-infusion), dimensions, and typical pricing. Compare them and recommend the top machine for someone serious about crafting quality espresso at home without breaking the bank.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & HOME ESPRESSO INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best home espresso machine under 1000”, “prosumer espresso machine budget”, “PID espresso machine review”; sources: coffee enthusiast forums (e.g., Home-Barista.com), specialty coffee blogs, appliance review sites, YouTube channels of coffee experts; timeframe: models popular and well-regarded in the last 2-3 years. Explain the step up from basic appliances. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable brands known for quality home espresso machines in this price range, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "BREW QUALITY & STEAM WAND CHECKLIST (ENTHUSIAST FOCUS) ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the machine is known for good temperature stability (e.g., has PID or stable thermoblock/boiler) AND possesses a capable steam wand for microfoam, or ❌ if inconsistent or wand is poor. Follow with the machine model. Note if it includes a decent quality built-in grinder. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from expert reviews.",
"3": "TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (BOILER, PUMP, GROUP) TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Machine Model | Boiler Type & Material (e.g., Single Boiler Dual Use, Thermoblock, Brass) | Pump Type & Max Pressure (e.g., Vibratory 15 bar) | Group Head Size & Material (e.g., 58mm Brass). Summarize key components. Limit to six machines. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "KEY FEATURES & BUILD QUALITY SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five machines. Columns: Model, PID Temperature Control (Yes/No/Type), Pre-infusion (Yes/No/Programmable), Included Accessories (e.g., Portafilter baskets, Tamper, Milk pitcher), Primary Build Materials & Weight. For 'PID', specify if brew/steam. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that a separate, quality grinder is often a crucial additional investment. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING, DIMENSIONS & WARRANTY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five machines. Rows per machine: Model, Typical Price ($/€), Dimensions (WxHxD cm), Warranty Period (Years). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on considering countertop space and water source (tank vs. plumbable). Cite all price, dimension, and warranty details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE ESPRESSO QUALITY & USER EXPERIENCE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the consistency and quality of espresso shots pulled, the machine's learning curve for a home barista, the effectiveness of the steam wand for latte art, and overall build robustness for *each* of the top 3-4 machines. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from reviews by experienced home baristas.",
"7": "USER RATING FOR SHOT QUALITY VS. PRICE PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Average User Rating for Espresso Shot Quality (Y-axis, scale 1-10 from enthusiast reviews) against Current Market Price (X-axis, in $/€)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Espresso machine shot quality vs price scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Home Espresso Machines: Shot Quality vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which machines offer the best perceived shot quality for the investment.",
"8": "RANKING OF HOME ESPRESSO MACHINES (UNDER $1000/€1000) ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 machines. Each <li> must contain the machine model, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting espresso quality, steam performance, build, ease of use for enthusiasts, and value. No citations here.",
"9": "MACHINE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR HOME BARISTAS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked machine, create one <li> with ☕ <strong>Espresso Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Learning/Maintenance Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., requires consistent puck prep, regular descaling crucial). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & HOME BARISTA TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Home Espresso Machine (Under $1000/€1000)</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning machine and explaining why its balance of brew control, steam power, and build quality makes it ideal for aspiring home baristas in this budget. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick home barista tips (e.g., use fresh, quality beans; invest in a good grinder; practice tamping consistency). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best wireless earbuds for running and exercise, prioritizing secure and comfortable fit during vigorous activity, sweat and water resistance (IP rating), battery life (earbuds and case), sound quality for motivational music, and reliable Bluetooth connectivity. List qualifying earbuds, detail their fit mechanisms (e.g., ear hooks, wingtips), IP rating, battery specs, audio drivers/codecs, and current pricing. Compare them and recommend the top wireless earbuds for active users.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & SPORT EARBUDS INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best wireless earbuds running”, “sweatproof earbuds gym”, “secure fit sport headphones”; sources: tech review sites specializing in audio and wearables, fitness blogs, runner/athlete forums, official product pages; focus: models with strong fit and durability claims, reviewed in last 12-18 months. Explain unique demands of sport earbuds. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable brands known for sport-focused wireless earbuds, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "SECURE FIT & SWEAT RESISTANCE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the earbuds feature a specific secure fit mechanism (hooks, wings) AND have an IPX4 rating or higher for sweat/water resistance, or ❌ if fit is standard or IP rating is low/missing. Follow with the earbud model. Note if different ear tip sizes are included. Maximum ten <li> entries; one citation per item from specs or reviews.",
"3": "AUDIO PERFORMANCE & CONNECTIVITY TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Earbud Model | Sound Quality Profile (e.g., Bass-heavy, Balanced, Customizable EQ) & Key Codecs (e.g., AAC, aptX) | Bluetooth Version & Connectivity Stability. Summarize sound and note Bluetooth version/reliability. Limit to six models. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "BATTERY LIFE & CONTROLS SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five earbuds. Columns: Model, Earbud Battery Life (hours), Charging Case Additional Life (hours), Control Type (Touch, Button, Voice), Call Quality/Mic Performance. For 'Control Type', mention if customizable. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that battery life varies with volume and feature usage (like ANC if present). Cite each feature.",
"5": "IP RATING, WEIGHT & PRICING TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five earbuds. Rows per earbud: Model, Exact IP Rating (e.g., IPX7, IP55), Weight per Earbud (grams), Typical Price ($/€). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on how higher IP ratings offer better protection but may affect sound slightly. Cite all specs and price details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE IN-EAR STABILITY & WORKOUT EXPERIENCE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing how well the earbuds stay in place during various exercises (running, jumping), comfort over extended workout sessions, ease of using controls while active, and overall sound motivation for *each* of the top 3-4 earbuds. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from reviews by active users or fitness tech testers.",
"7": "SECURE FIT RATING VS. BATTERY LIFE (TOTAL) PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Secure Fit & Comfort Rating During Exercise (Y-axis, scale 1-10 from aggregated reviews) against Total Battery Life including Case (X-axis, in hours)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Sport earbuds fit rating vs total battery life scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Sport Earbuds: Secure Fit vs. Total Endurance [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which earbuds offer the best combination for long, active sessions.",
"8": "RANKING OF WIRELESS EARBUDS FOR EXERCISE ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 earbuds. Each <li> must contain the earbud model, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting secure fit, sweat resistance, sound quality for motivation, battery life, and usability during workouts. No citations here.",
"9": "EARBUD STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR ACTIVE USE ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked earbud, create one <li> with 💪 <strong>Workout Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Sound/Fit Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., slightly bulky case, sound signature not for audiophiles). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & USAGE TIPS FOR ATHLETES ➜ Insert <h2>Best Wireless Earbuds for Running/Exercise</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning earbuds and explaining why their combination of secure fit, durability, sound, and battery makes them ideal for active individuals. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick usage tips (e.g., try all ear tip sizes for best seal/fit, clean regularly after sweating, understand control gestures before activity). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best smart thermostats for energy saving in residential homes, focusing on learning algorithms (adaptive scheduling), remote control via mobile app, compatibility with voice assistants (e.g., Alexa, Google Assistant), ease of installation and use, and clear energy usage reporting. List qualifying thermostats, detail their key smart features, HVAC system compatibility (e.g., conventional, heat pump), pricing, and any subscription fees for full functionality. Compare them and recommend the top smart thermostat for a homeowner looking to optimize comfort and reduce energy bills.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & SMART THERMOSTAT INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best smart thermostat energy saving”, “learning thermostat review”, “alexa compatible thermostat”; sources: home automation blogs, tech review sites, energy efficiency forums, official product documentation; focus: models with proven learning capabilities and strong user reviews, updated in last 1-2 years. Explain how smart thermostats save energy. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four well-known smart thermostat brands, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "LEARNING ALGORITHM & REMOTE ACCESS CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the thermostat features adaptive learning for schedules AND robust remote control via a well-rated mobile app, or ❌ if scheduling is manual-only or app is poor. Follow with the thermostat model. Note if geofencing is a key feature. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from reviews or specs.",
"3": "VOICE ASSISTANT & HVAC COMPATIBILITY TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Thermostat Model | Voice Assistant Compatibility (e.g., Alexa, Google, HomeKit, IFTTT) | Common HVAC System Compatibility (e.g., 24V conventional, Heat Pump, Multi-stage). List key assistants and summarize HVAC support. Limit to six models. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "ENERGY REPORTING & INSTALLATION SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five thermostats. Columns: Model, Energy Usage Reporting Features (Detail, Comparison over time), Ease of DIY Installation (User consensus, C-wire requirement), Display Type & Interface, Geofencing Capability. For 'Ease of DIY', note if professional install is often recommended. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that C-wire adapters can sometimes be used if one isn't present. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING, SUBSCRIPTIONS & SENSORS TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five thermostats. Rows per thermostat: Model, Typical Price ($/€), Subscription Fee for Full Features ($/month, if any), Support for Remote Sensors (Yes/No, cost per sensor). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on how remote sensors can improve comfort in larger homes. Cite all price and subscription details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE ENERGY SAVINGS & USER EXPERIENCE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the perceived effectiveness in reducing energy bills (based on user reports/reviews), the intuitiveness of the app and on-device controls, the reliability of its smart features (learning, geofencing), and overall satisfaction for *each* of the top 3-4 thermostats. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from long-term user reviews or energy saving case studies (if available).",
"7": "POTENTIAL ENERGY SAVINGS SCORE VS. INITIAL COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Estimated Energy Saving Potential Score (Y-axis, 1-10 based on learning, reporting, sensors, user reviews) against Initial Thermostat Price (X-axis, $/€)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Smart thermostat savings score vs price scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Smart Thermostats: Energy Saving Potential vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which thermostats offer the best potential return on investment.",
"8": "RANKING OF SMART THERMOSTATS FOR ENERGY SAVING ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 thermostats. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting learning capabilities, remote access, energy reporting, ease of use, and overall value for reducing energy consumption. No citations here.",
"9": "THERMOSTAT STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR HOMEOWNERS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked thermostat, create one <li> with 🔥 <strong>Energy Saving Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Installation/Compatibility Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., C-wire often needed, advanced features may have learning curve). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & OPTIMIZATION TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Smart Thermostat for Energy Efficiency</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning thermostat and explaining why its combination of intelligent learning, user-friendly controls, and robust energy reporting makes it ideal for homeowners seeking comfort and savings. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick optimization tips (e.g., allow time for learning period, utilize remote sensors if needed, review energy reports regularly). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best air purifiers for allergy sufferers, focusing on HEPA filtration effectiveness, CADR (Clean Air Delivery Rate) suitable for medium to large rooms, noise levels during operation (especially at night), and ease of filter replacement and maintenance. List qualifying air purifiers, detail their filtration stages, CADR ratings for smoke/dust/pollen, recommended room size, noise dB levels at different fan speeds, filter life and cost, and current unit pricing. Compare them and recommend the top air purifier for significantly reducing airborne allergens in a home environment.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & AIR PURIFIER INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best air purifier allergies HEPA”, “CADR air cleaner large room”, “quiet air purifier for bedroom”; sources: appliance review sites (e.g., Wirecutter, Consumer Reports), allergy/asthma foundation recommendations (if any), air quality expert blogs, user forums; focus: models with true HEPA and good CADR, reviewed in last 1-2 years. Explain how air purifiers help allergy symptoms. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable air purifier brands, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "HEPA FILTRATION & CADR FOR ALLERGIES CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the purifier features True HEPA filtration AND has a CADR for pollen/dust >150 (suitable for medium rooms), or ❌ if filter is not True HEPA or CADR is low. Follow with the model name. Note if it has additional carbon filters for odors/VOCs. Maximum ten <li> entries; one citation per item from specs or certifications.",
"3": "FILTRATION STAGES & NOISE LEVELS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Purifier Model | Filtration System Details (e.g., Pre-filter, True HEPA, Activated Carbon) | Noise Levels (dB at Low / Medium / High fan speeds). Summarize filter types and list dB ranges. Limit to six models. Every row must include a citation tag. Numeric 'Noise Levels' cells: <td style=\"text-align:right;\">.",
"4": "ROOM SIZE, CADR & SMART FEATURES SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five purifiers. Columns: Model, Recommended Room Size (sq ft / m²), CADR (Smoke, Dust, Pollen - if specified separately), Auto Mode/Air Quality Sensor, Smart Features (e.g., App control, Scheduling, Filter life indicator). For 'CADR', list the most relevant figure if only one is prominent. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that CADR should ideally match room size for effectiveness. Cite each feature.",
"5": "FILTER LIFE, COST & UNIT PRICING TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five purifiers. Rows per purifier: Model, HEPA Filter Life (months), HEPA Filter Replacement Cost ($/€), Unit Price ($/€). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on considering long-term filter replacement costs in total value. Cite all price and filter details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE ALLERGEN REDUCTION EFFECTIVENESS & USABILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the perceived effectiveness in reducing allergy symptoms (based on user reviews), the quietness of operation especially on lower settings, ease of filter changes and general maintenance, and overall user experience for *each* of the top 3-4 purifiers. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from reviews by allergy sufferers or air quality testers.",
"7": "CADR PER DOLLAR/EURO VS. NOISE LEVEL (LOW) PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'CADR (Pollen) per Unit Price (Y-axis) against Noise Level at Lowest Fan Speed (X-axis, in dB)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Air purifier CADR per price vs noise scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Air Purifiers: Allergen Cleaning Value vs. Quietness [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which purifiers offer good allergen removal quietly and cost-effectively.",
"8": "RANKING OF AIR PURIFIERS FOR ALLERGY RELIEF ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 purifiers. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting HEPA effectiveness, CADR for room size, quiet operation, filter cost/availability, and overall value for allergy sufferers. No citations here.",
"9": "PURIFIER STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR ALLERGENS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked purifier, create one <li> with 🤧 <strong>Allergy Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Operational Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., bulky size, filter cost). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & OPTIMAL USE TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Air Purifier for Allergy Sufferers</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning purifier and explaining why its combination of filtration power, quietness, and ease of maintenance makes it ideal for reducing airborne allergens. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick tips for optimal use (e.g., place in commonly used rooms, run continuously on auto mode during allergy season, replace filters on schedule). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best electric bikes (e-bikes) for urban commuting, prioritizing comfort, range (minimum 40km/25 miles), reliability of motor and battery, safety features (lights, good brakes), and overall value within a mid-range price bracket (e.g., €1500-€3000 / $1500-$3000). List qualifying e-bikes, detail their motor type/power, battery capacity (Wh), frame style (e.g., step-through, hybrid), included accessories (racks, fenders), and typical pricing. Compare them and recommend the top e-bike for a daily city commuter.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & URBAN E-BIKE INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best urban commuter ebike”, “electric bike city commuting review”, “reliable ebike 40km range”; sources: e-bike review websites, cycling forums, consumer reports on electric bikes, manufacturer specs; focus: models known for reliability and comfort in city environments, released/updated in last 1-2 years. Explain the rise of e-bikes for commuting. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable e-bike brands catering to commuters, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "RANGE & COMMUTER-FRIENDLY FEATURE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the e-bike offers a realistic range of at least 40km/25 miles AND includes commuter essentials like fenders and a rack (or easy mounting for them), or ❌ if range is low or essentials are missing. Follow with the e-bike model. Note if integrated lights are standard. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from specs or reviews.",
"3": "MOTOR, BATTERY & DRIVETRAIN SPECS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: E-Bike Model | Motor Type & Power (e.g., Mid-drive 250W, Hub 500W) & Max Assist Speed | Battery Capacity (Wh) & Estimated Range | Drivetrain (e.g., Shimano 8-speed, Enviolo CVT). Summarize motor details and list battery/drivetrain specifics. Limit to six e-bikes. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "FRAME, BRAKES & COMFORT FEATURES SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five e-bikes. Columns: Model, Frame Material & Style (e.g., Aluminum Step-through), Brake Type (e.g., Hydraulic Disc, Mechanical Disc), Suspension (Front/Seatpost/None), Tire Type & Width. For 'Frame Style', note if low-step is an option. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that test rides are crucial for assessing comfort. Cite each feature.",
"5": "WEIGHT, PRICE & WARRANTY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five e-bikes. Rows per e-bike: Model, Weight (kg/lbs), Typical Price (€/$), Warranty (Frame, Motor, Battery - years). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on considering local dealer support and availability. Cite all weight, price, and warranty details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE RIDE QUALITY & COMMUTING PRACTICALITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the smoothness of power assist, overall ride comfort on urban surfaces, handling in traffic, practicality of included accessories (lights, racks, fenders), and battery charging convenience for *each* of the top 3-4 e-bikes. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from commuter reviews or long-term tests.",
"7": "COMMUTER SUITABILITY SCORE VS. PRICE PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Urban Commuter Suitability Score (Y-axis, based on range, comfort, accessories, reliability) against Price (X-axis, in $/€)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Urban e-bike suitability vs price scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Urban E-bikes: Commuter Suitability vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which e-bikes offer the best overall package for city commuting.",
"8": "RANKING OF URBAN COMMUTER E-BIKES ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 e-bikes. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting range, comfort, reliability, commuter features (lights, rack, fenders), and overall value for daily city riding. No citations here.",
"9": "E-BIKE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR CITY COMMUTING ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked e-bike, create one <li> with 🚲 <strong>Commuter Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Weight/Maintenance Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., quite heavy for stairs, dealer-specific motor). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & E-BIKE COMMUTING TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best E-Bike for Urban Commuting</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning e-bike and explaining why its balance of range, comfort, practical features, and reliability makes it ideal for daily city travel. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick e-bike commuting tips (e.g., invest in a good lock, learn basic battery care, plan routes considering bike lanes). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best digital drawing tablets for beginner artists, focusing on pressure sensitivity levels, active drawing area size, ease of driver installation and software compatibility (e.g., Krita, GIMP, Photoshop), included stylus features (e.g., tilt support, buttons), and overall value for money (typically under $200/€200 for screenless, under $400/€400 for display tablets). List qualifying tablets, detail their specifications, connectivity options, and typical pricing. Compare screenless tablets and entry-level display tablets separately if appropriate, then recommend a top choice for a beginner looking to start digital art.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & BEGINNER DRAWING TABLET INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best drawing tablet for beginners”, “affordable graphics tablet Krita”, “entry level display tablet review”; sources: digital art blogs, YouTube reviews by artists, art student forums, manufacturer websites; focus: tablets offering good drawing experience without overwhelming features or cost, updated in last 1-2 years. Explain difference between screenless and display tablets. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable brands for beginner drawing tablets, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "PRESSURE SENSITIVITY & USABLE AREA CHECKLIST (BEGINNER FOCUS) ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the tablet offers at least 8192 levels of pressure sensitivity AND a decent active area (e.g., ~8x5 inches for screenless, ~11 inches for display), or ❌ if low sensitivity or very small area. Follow with the tablet model. Note if tilt recognition is supported. Maximum ten <li> entries; one citation per item from specs.",
"3": "STYLUS FEATURES & SOFTWARE COMPATIBILITY TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Tablet Model | Stylus Technology (EMR/AES, Battery-free?, Buttons) | Key Software Compatibility (e.g., Krita, Photoshop, Clip Studio Paint). Summarize stylus tech and list 2-3 compatible software. Limit to six models (mix of screenless/display if sensible). Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "CONNECTIVITY, RESOLUTION & BUILD SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five tablets. Columns: Model, Connectivity (USB-C, HDMI for display), Screen Resolution & Gamut (for display tablets, LPI for screenless), Express Keys (Number, Customizable), Build Quality/Feel (User consensus). For 'Resolution', specify LPI for screenless. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that driver stability is crucial for a good experience. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICE, TYPE & INCLUDED ACCESSORIES TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five tablets. Rows per tablet: Model, Type (Screenless/Display), Typical Price ($/€), Included Accessories (e.g., Extra nibs, Glove, Stand). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on checking for current driver versions upon setup. Cite all price and accessory details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE DRAWING EXPERIENCE & LEARNING CURVE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the feel of drawing on the surface, the responsiveness of the stylus, the ease of setup and driver installation for beginners, and overall drawing experience for *each* of the top 3-4 tablets (distinguish screenless vs display if comparing both types). Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from reviews by beginner digital artists.",
"7": "DRAWING EXPERIENCE SCORE VS. PRICE PLOT (SEPARATE IF NEEDED) ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Beginner Drawing Experience Score (Y-axis, based on pressure, latency, surface feel, ease of setup) against Price (X-axis, in $/€)'. Consider if separate plots for screenless and display are needed. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Drawing tablet experience vs price scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Beginner Drawing Tablets: Experience vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which tablets offer the best drawing feel for the price.",
"8": "RANKING OF DIGITAL DRAWING TABLETS FOR BEGINNERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 tablets (could be a mix, or specify best screenless/best display). Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting pressure sensitivity, active area, ease of use for beginners, software compatibility, and value. No citations here.",
"9": "TABLET STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR NEW ARTISTS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked tablet, create one <li> with 🖌️ <strong>Artist Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Setup/Use Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., parallax on display, driver quirks). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & DIGITAL ART STARTING TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Drawing Tablet for Beginners</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning tablet (or one screenless and one display option if appropriate) and explaining why its features and price point make it ideal for starting digital art. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick digital art tips for beginners (e.g., practice basic strokes, learn layers in your software, don't be afraid to experiment). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best portable Bluetooth speakers focusing on a balance of sound quality (clarity, bass response for size), durability (water/dust resistance - IP rating), battery life (minimum 10 hours), and portability (weight, form factor). List qualifying speakers, detail their audio drivers, connectivity options (Bluetooth version, NFC, Aux-in), battery specifications, IP rating, dimensions/weight, and current pricing. Compare them and recommend the top portable Bluetooth speaker for general outdoor and indoor use.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & PORTABLE SPEAKER INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best portable bluetooth speaker”, “durable waterproof speaker review”, “loud clear bluetooth speaker outdoor”; sources: audio tech review sites (e.g., Rtings, What Hi-Fi?), consumer electronics blogs, YouTube sound comparisons, user forums; focus: models offering good sound-to-size ratio and ruggedness, reviewed in last 1-2 years. Explain the appeal of portable audio. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable brands known for quality portable Bluetooth speakers, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "SOUND QUALITY & DURABILITY CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the speaker is generally praised for balanced sound quality (for its size) AND has an IP67 rating or similar for good water/dust protection, or ❌ if sound is poor or durability is low. Follow with the speaker model. Note if stereo pairing with another identical speaker is possible. Maximum ten <li> entries; one citation per item from reviews or specs.",
"3": "AUDIO SPECS & CONNECTIVITY TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Speaker Model | Audio Driver Configuration & Output Power (Watts, if stated) | Bluetooth Version & Supported Codecs (e.g., SBC, AAC, aptX). Summarize driver setup and list BT/codec details. Limit to six models. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "BATTERY, PORTABILITY & EXTRA FEATURES SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five speakers. Columns: Model, Claimed Battery Life (hours), Charging Time (hours) & Port (e.g., USB-C), Dimensions (HxWxD cm) & Weight (grams), Extra Features (e.g., Built-in mic, App control, Party mode). Numeric cells (battery, weight) use <td style=\"text-align:right;\">. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that actual battery life varies with volume and content. Cite each feature.",
"5": "IP RATING, PRICE & WARRANTY TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five speakers. Rows per speaker: Model, Exact IP Rating (e.g., IP67, IPX7), Typical Price ($/€), Warranty Period (Years). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on checking for color options or bundled accessories. Cite all spec, price, and warranty details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE SOUND PERFORMANCE & REAL-WORLD USABILITY ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the clarity, bass depth, and loudness of the sound in various environments (indoor/outdoor), the ease of carrying and operating the speaker, battery endurance in typical use, and overall robustness for *each* of the top 3-4 speakers. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from hands-on reviews or sound tests.",
"7": "SOUND QUALITY SCORE VS. PORTABILITY SCORE (SIZE/WEIGHT) PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Overall Sound Quality Score (Y-axis, 1-10 from aggregated reviews) against a Portability Score (X-axis, inverse of size/weight, higher is more portable)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Bluetooth speaker sound quality vs portability scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Portable Bluetooth Speakers: Sound vs. Portability [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which speakers offer the best sound for their ease of carrying.",
"8": "RANKING OF PORTABLE BLUETOOTH SPEAKERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 speakers. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting sound quality for size, durability, battery life, portability, and overall value for versatile use. No citations here.",
"9": "SPEAKER STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR PORTABLE USE ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked speaker, create one <li> with 🔊 <strong>Audio Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Portability/Feature Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., slightly bulky for some, no aux input). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & USAGE TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best All-Around Portable Bluetooth Speaker</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning speaker and explaining why its balance of sound, ruggedness, battery life, and portability makes it an excellent choice for most users. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick usage tips (e.g., charge fully before first extended use, keep firmware updated via app if available, be mindful of sand/grit even if dustproof). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best water filter pitchers for improving tap water taste and reducing common contaminants (e.g., chlorine, lead, some particulates), focusing on filter effectiveness, filtration speed, pitcher capacity and design, ease of use and filter replacement, and long-term cost (pitcher + filter replacements). List qualifying pitchers, detail their filter technology and certified contaminant reductions, pitcher ergonomics, filter lifespan and cost, and overall unit pricing. Compare them and recommend the top water filter pitcher for everyday household use.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & WATER FILTER PITCHER INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best water filter pitcher taste”, “NSF certified water pitcher lead chlorine”, “compare water filter jugs”; sources: consumer testing organizations (e.g., Consumer Reports, NSF International if data accessible), home goods review sites, environmental health blogs, user forums; focus: pitchers with certified filters and good user reviews for taste improvement, info from last 1-2 years. Explain common reasons for using filter pitchers. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four reputable brands for water filter pitchers, each <li> with brand name and a citation.",
"2": "CERTIFIED CONTAMINANT REDUCTION & TASTE IMPROVEMENT CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the pitcher's filter is certified by a recognized body (e.g., NSF/ANSI Standards 42, 53) for reducing chlorine AND lead, AND is widely reported to improve taste, or ❌ if certifications are unclear or taste improvement is minimal. Follow with the pitcher model/filter type. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from certifications or reviews.",
"3": "FILTER TECHNOLOGY & FILTRATION SPEED TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Pitcher Model | Filter Media/Technology Used (e.g., Activated Carbon, Ion Exchange Resin) | Typical Filtration Time for Full Pitcher (minutes). Summarize filter tech and state approx. filtration time. Limit to six models. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "PITCHER DESIGN, CAPACITY & EASE OF USE SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five pitchers. Columns: Model, Total Pitcher Capacity (Liters/Cups), Filtered Water Capacity, Lid/Refill Mechanism (e.g., Pour-through, Easy-fill lid), Filter Change Indicator. For 'Capacity', distinguish total vs. filtered. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that pitcher ergonomics (handle, spout) affect daily usability. Cite each feature.",
"5": "FILTER LIFESPAN, COST & PITCHER PRICE TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five pitchers. Rows per pitcher: Model, Rated Filter Lifespan (Gallons/Liters or Months), Cost per Replacement Filter ($/€), Pitcher Unit Price ($/€). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on calculating long-term cost per gallon/liter. Cite all price and filter details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE TASTE DIFFERENCE & DAILY CONVENIENCE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the noticeable difference in water taste and odor, the convenience of refilling and pouring, the accuracy and usefulness of the filter change indicator, and overall daily user experience for *each* of the top 3-4 pitchers. Bold the model name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews focusing on taste tests and daily use.",
"7": "EFFECTIVENESS SCORE (TASTE & CERTIFICATION) VS. ANNUAL COST OF OWNERSHIP PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Water Quality Improvement Score (Y-axis, based on certifications and user taste ratings) against Estimated Annual Cost (X-axis, pitcher + filters for typical use, $/€)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Water filter pitcher effectiveness vs annual cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Water Filter Pitchers: Effectiveness vs. Long-Term Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which pitchers offer the best certified filtration and taste improvement for the ongoing cost.",
"8": "RANKING OF WATER FILTER PITCHERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 pitchers. Each <li> must contain the model name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting filter effectiveness (contaminants, taste), ease of use, filter lifespan/cost, and overall value for household use. No citations here.",
"9": "PITCHER STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR HOME USE ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked pitcher, create one <li> with💧 <strong>Filtration Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Usability/Cost Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., slow filtration, frequent filter changes). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & PITCHER CARE TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Water Filter Pitcher for Home Use</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning pitcher and explaining why its balance of certified filtration, taste improvement, usability, and filter economy makes it ideal for everyday household needs. Include the plain text official product or reputable retailer URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick pitcher care tips (e.g., wash pitcher regularly (excluding filter), change filter on schedule, use cold tap water only). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best online therapy and counseling services available in the USA, focusing on therapist qualifications and licensing, range of therapy types offered (e.g., CBT, DBT, psychodynamic), communication methods (video, phone, messaging), ease of use of the platform, and pricing/insurance acceptance. List qualifying services, detail their therapist matching process, subscription plans, privacy policies (HIPAA compliance), and user feedback on effectiveness. Compare them and recommend the top online therapy service for individuals seeking convenient and professional mental health support.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & ONLINE THERAPY INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best online therapy USA”, “compare teletherapy platforms”, “licensed online counselor reviews”; sources: mental health publications, therapy directories, healthcare review sites, user testimonials on platforms like Reddit; focus: platforms with licensed therapists and strong privacy, info from last 12 months. Discuss the rise and benefits of teletherapy. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four major online therapy platforms operating in the USA, each <li> with platform name and a citation.",
"2": "LICENSED THERAPISTS & HIPAA COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the platform explicitly states it uses licensed therapists (e.g., LCSW, PhD, PsyD) AND is HIPAA compliant, or ❌ if therapist qualifications are unclear or HIPAA is not mentioned. Follow with the platform name. Note if therapist bios/credentials are viewable before matching. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from platform FAQs or policies.",
"3": "THERAPY TYPES & COMMUNICATION METHODS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Platform | Common Therapy Approaches Offered (e.g., CBT, DBT, Couples Therapy, Psychiatry for meds) | Communication Options with Therapist (e.g., Live video, Live phone, Asynchronous messaging, Group sessions). Summarize approaches and list communication modes. Limit to six platforms. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "MATCHING PROCESS & PLATFORM USABILITY SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five platforms. Columns: Platform, Therapist Matching Process (e.g., Questionnaire-based, User choice from directory), Ease of Scheduling & Rescheduling, Mobile App Availability & Rating (iOS/Android), User Interface Quality (General consensus). For 'Matching Process', describe briefly. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that finding the right therapist fit can sometimes take a few tries. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING, INSURANCE & SUBSCRIPTION DETAILS TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five platforms. Rows per platform: Typical Subscription Cost ($/week or $/month), What's Included (e.g., weekly sessions, unlimited messaging), Insurance Acceptance (In-network with major plans?), Cancellation Policy. Show prices in $. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on checking for out-of-network reimbursement options. Cite all pricing and insurance details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE THERAPEUTIC EFFECTIVENESS & USER EXPERIENCE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing user-reported effectiveness of therapy received, the quality of the therapist-client connection facilitated by the platform, ease of using the technology for sessions, and overall satisfaction with the service for *each* of the top 3-4 platforms. Bold the platform name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews or independent studies (if available).",
"7": "USER SATISFACTION SCORE VS. MONTHLY COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Overall User Satisfaction Score (Y-axis, 1-10 from aggregated reviews covering therapist quality, platform, support) against Average Monthly Cost for a common plan (X-axis, in $)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Online therapy satisfaction vs cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Online Therapy Platforms: User Satisfaction vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which platforms offer high user satisfaction at a reasonable price point.",
"8": "RANKING OF ONLINE THERAPY SERVICES (USA) ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 platforms. Each <li> must contain the platform name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting therapist quality, range of services, ease of use, privacy, and overall value for mental health support. No citations here.",
"9": "PLATFORM STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR TELETHERAPY ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked platform, create one <li> with ❤️ <strong>Therapy Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Access/Cost Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., insurance limitations, messaging response times). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & GETTING STARTED WITH ONLINE THERAPY TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Online Therapy Service (USA)</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning platform and explaining why its combination of qualified therapists, user-friendly platform, and flexible options makes it ideal for accessing mental healthcare. Include the plain text official website URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick tips for starting online therapy (e.g., be honest in intake forms, prepare questions for your first session, ensure a private space for sessions). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best pet insurance providers in the UK, focusing on comprehensive coverage (accident, illness, dental for some), clarity of policy terms (exclusions, excess, co-payment), customer service reputation, and value for money (premium vs. coverage level). List qualifying providers, detail their main policy types (e.g., lifetime, max benefit, time-limited), typical coverage limits for vet fees, key exclusions, and average monthly premium for a common pet (e.g., medium-sized dog). Compare them and recommend the top pet insurance provider for UK pet owners seeking peace of mind.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & UK PET INSURANCE INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best pet insurance UK reviews”, “compare UK pet insurance lifetime cover”, “dog insurance comprehensive UK”; sources: UK financial advice sites (e.g., MoneySavingExpert, Which?), pet owner forums, insurance comparison tools, official provider documents; focus: providers with clear policies and good customer feedback, info from last 12 months. Explain the importance of pet insurance. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four major UK pet insurance providers, each <li> with provider name and a citation.",
"2": "COMPREHENSIVE COVERAGE & POLICY CLARITY CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the provider offers lifetime policies with clear information on vet fee limits AND common exclusions are transparently stated, or ❌ if policies are mainly time-limited or terms are opaque. Follow with the provider name. Note if dental illness cover is included or an add-on. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from policy documents or reviews.",
"3": "POLICY TYPES & VET FEE COVERAGE LIMITS TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Provider | Main Policy Types Offered (e.g., Lifetime, Max Benefit per condition) | Typical Annual Vet Fee Limits Available (e.g., £2k, £5k, £10k+). Summarize policy types and list common limit tiers. Limit to six providers. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "EXCESS, CO-PAYMENT & ADDITIONAL BENEFITS SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five providers. Columns: Provider, Standard Excess Amount(s) (£), Co-payment Structure (e.g., % after excess, often for older pets), Key Additional Benefits (e.g., Third party liability, Farewell cover, Travel cover), Claim Process Ease (User consensus). For 'Excess', note if variable. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that pre-existing conditions are almost never covered. Cite each feature.",
"5": "SAMPLE PREMIUMS & CUSTOMER SERVICE RATING TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five providers. Rows per provider: Provider, Sample Monthly Premium (e.g., for 1yr old Lab, London, £7k cover), Customer Service Rating (e.g., Defaqto, Trustpilot score summary), Multi-pet Discount (Yes/No, %). Show prices in £. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) that premiums vary hugely by breed, age, and location. Cite all premium examples and service ratings.",
"6": "NARRATIVE CLAIMS EXPERIENCE & POLICY VALUE ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing user-reported experiences with making claims (speed, fairness), the perceived value for money considering the coverage level and premium, and the helpfulness of customer support for *each* of the top 3-4 providers. Bold the provider name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from UK pet owner reviews or financial product comparisons.",
"7": "COVERAGE SCORE (LIFETIME POLICIES) VS. SAMPLE MONTHLY PREMIUM PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Comprehensive Lifetime Coverage Score (Y-axis, based on vet fee limit, dental, other benefits, exclusions clarity) against Sample Monthly Premium (X-axis, for a specific pet profile, in £)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"UK pet insurance coverage score vs premium scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – UK Pet Insurance: Lifetime Coverage Value vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which providers offer strong lifetime cover at a competitive premium.",
"8": "RANKING OF UK PET INSURANCE PROVIDERS ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 providers. Each <li> must contain the provider name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting comprehensive lifetime cover, clarity of terms, customer service during claims, and overall value for UK pet owners. No citations here.",
"9": "PROVIDER STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES (UK PET INSURANCE) ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked provider, create one <li> with 🐾 <strong>Coverage Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Cost/Claim Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., higher premium for top cover, specific claim condition). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & PET INSURANCE TIPS (UK) ➜ Insert <h2>Best Pet Insurance Provider (UK)</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning provider and explaining why its combination of comprehensive lifetime policies, fair claim handling, and customer support makes it ideal for UK pet owners. Include the plain text official website URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick tips for UK pet owners choosing insurance (e.g., insure from a young age, read policy wording carefully especially exclusions, consider lifetime cover for chronic conditions). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best resume/CV writing services for mid-career professionals seeking to advance their careers or change industries, focusing on writer expertise and qualifications, quality of writing and keyword optimization for ATS, collaboration process with the writer, turnaround time, and pricing for resume and cover letter packages. List qualifying services, detail their process, writer credentials, types of documents offered (resume, CV, cover letter, LinkedIn profile), pricing structures, and any guarantees or revision policies. Compare them and recommend the top service for a professional investing in a high-impact job application.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & RESUME WRITING SERVICE INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best resume writing service mid career”, “professional CV writer reviews”, “ATS optimized resume service”; sources: career advice blogs, LinkedIn articles by recruiters, review sites for professional services, writer association directories (e.g., PARW/CC); focus: services with certified writers and proven results for professionals, info from last 12-18 months. Explain the value of a professionally written resume. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four well-regarded resume writing services, each <li> with service name and a citation.",
"2": "WRITER QUALIFICATIONS & ATS OPTIMIZATION CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the service employs certified writers (e.g., CPRW, NCRW) AND explicitly states they optimize for Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS), or ❌ if writer credentials are vague or ATS is not mentioned. Follow with the service name. Note if they specialize in certain industries. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from service websites or samples.",
"3": "WRITING PROCESS & COLLABORATION TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Service | Typical Writing Process (e.g., Questionnaire, Phone consult, Revisions) | Direct Writer Communication & Collaboration. Summarize process steps and detail communication methods. Limit to six services. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "SERVICES OFFERED & TURNAROUND TIME SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five services. Columns: Service, Documents Offered (Resume, CV, Cover Letter, LinkedIn, Thank You Notes), Standard Turnaround Time (Business days), Rush Service Availability & Cost, Number of Revisions Included. For 'Documents Offered', list key ones. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that quality should not be rushed, but deadlines are a reality. Cite each feature.",
"5": "PRICING FOR PACKAGES & GUARANTEES TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five services. Rows per service: Service, Price for Resume Only ($/£), Price for Resume + Cover Letter Package, Price for LinkedIn Profile Update, Interview Guarantee or Satisfaction Guarantee (Details). Show prices with appropriate currency. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on understanding what any guarantee actually entails. Cite all pricing and guarantee details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE QUALITY OF OUTPUT & CLIENT SATISFACTION ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the perceived quality of sample resumes (clarity, impact, keyword density), client testimonials regarding job search success after using the service, and overall professionalism and responsiveness for *each* of the top 3-4 services. Bold the service name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from client reviews or industry awards.",
"7": "CLIENT SATISFACTION SCORE (MID-CAREER) VS. PACKAGE PRICE PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Mid-Career Client Satisfaction Score (Y-axis, 1-10 from aggregated reviews considering quality, process, results) against Price for a Resume + Cover Letter Package (X-axis, in $/£)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Resume service satisfaction vs package price scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – Resume Writing Services: Client Satisfaction vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which services offer high satisfaction at a reasonable investment for professionals.",
"8": "RANKING OF RESUME/CV WRITING SERVICES ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 services. Each <li> must contain the service name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting writer expertise, quality of writing for ATS/humans, collaboration, turnaround, and value for mid-career professionals. No citations here.",
"9": "SERVICE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR PROFESSIONALS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked service, create one <li> with 📄 <strong>Resume Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Process/Cost Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., higher price point, initial questionnaire is lengthy). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & WORKING WITH A WRITER TIPS ➜ Insert <h2>Best Resume Service for Mid-Career Professionals</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning service and explaining why its combination of expert writers, collaborative process, and high-quality output makes it ideal for professionals seeking career advancement. Include the plain text official website URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick tips for working with a resume writer (e.g., provide detailed career information, communicate your goals clearly, actively participate in revisions). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
Identify the best car sharing services in major European cities (e.g., London, Paris, Berlin), focusing on vehicle availability and variety, pricing structure (per minute/hour/day, subscription options), ease of app use for booking and unlocking, parking regulations and flexibility, and customer support. List qualifying services, detail their operational cities, fleet composition (e.g., EV, compact, van), pricing models, and any membership fees or insurance details. Compare them and recommend the top car sharing service for flexible urban mobility.
|
{
"1": "RESEARCH SCOPE & EUROPEAN CAR SHARING INTRODUCTION ➜ In one <p> (≈80 words), outline the search: keywords “best car sharing Europe”, “compare Paris car sharing services”, “London pay as you go car rental”; sources: urban mobility blogs, local city transport guides, app store reviews for car sharing apps, official service websites, user forums; focus: services with good vehicle distribution and clear pricing in key European capitals, info from last 12 months. Explain the benefits of car sharing in cities. Conclude with an HTML <ul> listing exactly four major car sharing services operating in Europe, each <li> with service name and a citation.",
"2": "VEHICLE AVAILABILITY (MAJOR CITIES) & EASE OF BOOKING CHECKLIST ➜ Create an HTML <ul>. Each <li> shows ✅ if the service has a significant presence with good vehicle density in at least two major European cities (e.g., London, Paris, Berlin) AND offers a user-friendly app for finding/booking/unlocking, or ❌ if availability is sparse or app is poor. Follow with the service name. Note if one-way trips are generally allowed. Maximum eight <li> entries; one citation per item from service coverage maps or app reviews.",
"3": "FLEET COMPOSITION & PRICING STRUCTURE TABLE ➜ Output an HTML <table> (<thead>, <tbody>) with columns: Service | Typical Vehicle Models Available (e.g., Fiat 500, Renault Zoe EV, BMW 1 Series, Small Vans) | Core Pricing Model (e.g., Per minute, Per hour, Day packages, Mileage fees). Summarize vehicle types and pricing approach. Limit to six services. Every row must include a citation tag.",
"4": "PARKING RULES, INSURANCE & MEMBERSHIP SPECS ➜ Build an HTML table for the top five services. Columns: Service, Parking Regulations (e.g., Designated zones, Free-floating within business area), Standard Insurance Coverage (Excess/Deductible amount €/£), Membership Fees (Registration, Monthly/Annual), Minimum Rental Duration. For 'Parking', summarize flexibility. After </table>, add a 25-word italicised footnote in a <p><em>…</em></p> that users must understand local parking rules to avoid fines. Cite each feature.",
"5": "OPERATIONAL CITIES & CUSTOMER SUPPORT TABLE ➜ Construct an HTML table for the same five services. Rows per service: Service, Key European Cities of Operation (List 3-5), Customer Support Channels (e.g., In-app chat, Phone, 24/7?), User Ratings for Support (General consensus). Show city names. Close with a <p> (≤25 words) on checking specific city coverage before relying on a service. Cite all operational and support details.",
"6": "NARRATIVE USER EXPERIENCE & COST-EFFECTIVENESS FOR URBAN TRIPS ➜ Write ≈130 words in one <p> discussing the ease of finding and accessing cars when needed, the typical cost for short urban trips (e.g., 30-min drive), the condition and cleanliness of vehicles, and overall convenience and reliability for *each* of the top 3-4 services. Bold the service name with <strong>…</strong> on first mention. Embed at least two inline citations from user reviews in specific European cities.",
"7": "CONVENIENCE SCORE (AVAILABILITY & APP UX) VS. AVERAGE HOURLY COST PLOT ➜ Precede the graph with a 40-word <p> describing its axes: 'Urban Convenience Score (Y-axis, based on vehicle availability in major cities, app ease of use, parking flexibility) against Average Estimated Hourly Cost (X-axis, in €/£, including typical per-km fees if applicable)'. Embed: <img src=\"GRAPH_PLACEHOLDER\" alt=\"Car sharing convenience vs hourly cost scatterplot\">, followed by <figcaption>Figure 1 – European Car Sharing: Convenience vs. Cost [citation]</figcaption>. Add a sentence interpreting which services offer high convenience at a competitive price point.",
"8": "RANKING OF CAR SHARING SERVICES (EUROPEAN CITIES) ➜ Produce an HTML ordered list (<ol>) of the top 3-5 services. Each <li> must contain the service name, an em-dash (—), and a 17-word justification highlighting vehicle availability, ease of app use, flexible parking, transparent pricing, and overall suitability for urban mobility. No citations here.",
"9": "SERVICE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES FOR CITY DRIVERS ➜ Output an HTML <ul>. For each ranked service, create one <li> with 🚗 <strong>Urban Mobility Pro:</strong> … and 🤔 <strong>Pricing/Availability Note:</strong> … (total ≤30 words, e.g., can be pricey for longer trips, peak time availability). Base on previously cited information.",
"10": "TOP RECOMMENDATION & CAR SHARING USAGE TIPS (EUROPE) ➜ Insert <h2>Best Car Sharing Service for European Cities</h2>, then a 75-word <p> naming the winning service and explaining why its combination of widespread availability, user-friendly app, and flexible pricing makes it ideal for navigating major European urban centers. Include the plain text official website URL. Finish with an HTML <ol> of three quick tips for using car sharing in Europe (e.g., always check car for damage before driving, understand the specific city's parking rules, be aware of low emission zone restrictions). Add one citation for the URL."
}
|
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 4